|
| 1 | +# CgiHttpKernel |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Adapter from HttpKernelInterface to CGI. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +## The HttpKernelInterface is a lie |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +You thought that you need to rewrite your whole application to use |
| 8 | +HttpFoundation in order to benefit from HttpKernelInterface functional |
| 9 | +testing? |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Well, it turns out that you don't need that at all. Some very smart people |
| 12 | +came up with this thing called CGI (Common Gateway Interface) which defines an |
| 13 | +interface between a web server and a web application. It's great because it |
| 14 | +uses UNIX pipes for communication, which means it is also very easy to pretend |
| 15 | +to be a web server, and just call the app with any input and env vars on the |
| 16 | +command line by hand. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +In PHP that works by using `php-cgi`, which fortunately ships with almost |
| 19 | +every PHP distribution. The most basic way of calling it on the command line |
| 20 | +is this: |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | + $ php-cgi hello.php |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +If you want to learn how to do more advanced stuff, read the fucking CGI spec. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +So what does this have to do with HttpKernelInterface? CGI and that interface |
| 27 | +do pretty much the same thing, they abstract communication between web server |
| 28 | +and app. The kernel interface does this within PHP, CGI does it in a language |
| 29 | +agnostic way. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +The CgiHttpKernel translates between those two interfaces. As a user of the |
| 32 | +library you interact with it as if it were a true HttpKernelInterface app, but |
| 33 | +in the background it will actually go ahead and call `php-cgi` on the command |
| 34 | +line, parse the output, and return a `Response` instance. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +For example: |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | + $kernel = new CgiHttpKernel(__DIR__.'/../phpBB'); |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | + $request = Request::create('/index.php'); |
| 41 | + $response = $kernel->handle($request); |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | + var_dump($response->getContent()); |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +You can also pass a second argument to the constructor if you want all |
| 46 | +requests to go through a front controller. |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | + $kernel = new CgiHttpKernel(__DIR__.'/../web', 'app.php'); |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | + $request = Request::create('/foo'); |
| 51 | + $response = $kernel->handle($request); |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +The real power however comes from using libraries that integrate with the |
| 54 | +HttpKernelInterface, such as `Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Client`. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | + $kernel = new CgiHttpKernel(__DIR__.'/../phpBB'); |
| 57 | + $client = new Client($kernel); |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | + $crawler = $client->request('GET', 'index.php'); |
| 60 | + $this->assertGreaterThan(0, $crawler->filter('.topiclist')->count()); |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +## Is it really a lie? |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +Not really. The CgiHttpKernel only makes sense for functional testing, since |
| 65 | +it is quite slow. It is slow because it must spawn a new process for every |
| 66 | +request. This is also the reason why some very smart people came up with |
| 67 | +FastCGI, which is like CGI but faster. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +FastCGI allows the app to start a long-running process that listens on a port |
| 70 | +and thus does not have the process spawning overhead. In PHP land this is |
| 71 | +usually managed by PHP-FPM, aka FastCGI Process Manager. |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +FastCGI is good for production but not really practical for testing since it |
| 74 | +needs to run in a separate process, listen on a port, requires configuration, |
| 75 | +etc. |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +## When to use CgiHttpKernel? |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +It is mainly intended to write functional tests for legacy applications. That |
| 80 | +will hopefully enable you to refactor your legacy code with some confidence of |
| 81 | +not breaking stuff. |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +Good luck. |
0 commit comments