Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

on CUDA exact_sstp_cond 3 times faster than the default? #326

Open
pdziekan opened this issue Jun 6, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

on CUDA exact_sstp_cond 3 times faster than the default? #326

pdziekan opened this issue Jun 6, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@pdziekan
Copy link
Contributor

pdziekan commented Jun 6, 2018

Judging from the lgrngn_cond_substep tests, exact (per-particle) substepping is much faster than the old, per-cell substepping.
Why is it so? I expected the opposite.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pdziekan