Skip to content

Prepare 82 virtual channels #114

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

matthiasgeihs
Copy link
Contributor

Splitting some commits from #83 .

Signed-off-by: Matthias Geihs <matthias@perun.network>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Geihs <matthias@perun.network>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Geihs <matthias@perun.network>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Geihs <matthias@perun.network>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Geihs <matthias@perun.network>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Geihs <matthias@perun.network>
@matthiasgeihs matthiasgeihs force-pushed the prepare-82-virtual-channels branch from a0d0c65 to ea250c2 Compare June 18, 2021 12:52
Copy link
Contributor

@ggwpez ggwpez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The commit structure makes it easy to follow 👍

Signed-off-by: Matthias Geihs <matthias@perun.network>
This enables the framework to distinguish between standard channel
update messages and funding or settlement update messages.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Geihs <matthias@perun.network>
Because it contains not just watching, but also registering, progressing, and settling.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Geihs <matthias@perun.network>
@matthiasgeihs matthiasgeihs force-pushed the prepare-82-virtual-channels branch from ea250c2 to c05d177 Compare June 21, 2021 07:34
@matthiasgeihs matthiasgeihs requested a review from ggwpez June 21, 2021 07:55
@ggwpez ggwpez merged commit c50c75f into hyperledger-labs:dev Jun 22, 2021
@ggwpez ggwpez deleted the prepare-82-virtual-channels branch June 22, 2021 08:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants