#435 Rename review skills to lite and pro#531
Merged
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR renames and consolidates review skills: preserves legacy as deep-review-lite, renames the orchestrator deep-review-next → deep-review-pro, and updates symlinks, agent prompts, commit hooks, Codex wrappers, and docs to the new names. ChangesDeep-review Skills Rename and Path Consolidation
Estimated Code Review Effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.claude/skills/fix-issue/SKILL.md:
- Around line 7-14: Normalize the incoming issue identifier once (e.g., strip a
leading '#' from $ARGUMENTS into a new variable like ISSUE or ISSUE_NUM) and
then use that normalized variable everywhere instead of $ARGUMENTS; update the
PARENT lookup (the gh api call that sets PARENT) and any later uses that build
PR body text (e.g., places that generate "Closes #...") to reference the
normalized ISSUE variable so you never pass "##322" or include an extra '#' in
API calls or PR text.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 9fb84357-5a28-405a-b3c4-c0ca4925af36
📒 Files selected for processing (33)
.agents/skills/deep-review.agents/skills/deep-review-lite.agents/skills/deep-review-next.agents/skills/deep-review-pro.claude/agents/deep-review-architecture.md.claude/agents/deep-review-ci.md.claude/agents/deep-review-code.md.claude/agents/deep-review-docs.md.claude/agents/deep-review-project-checklist.md.claude/agents/deep-review-python.md.claude/agents/deep-review-qa.md.claude/agents/deep-review-security.md.claude/agents/deep-review-simplification.md.claude/agents/deep-review-typescript.md.claude/agents/deep-review-unit-test.md.claude/settings.json.claude/skills/deep-review-lite/SKILL.md.claude/skills/deep-review-pro/REFERENCES.md.claude/skills/deep-review-pro/SKILL.md.claude/skills/fix-issue/SKILL.md.codex/agents/deep-review-architecture.toml.codex/agents/deep-review-ci.toml.codex/agents/deep-review-code.toml.codex/agents/deep-review-docs.toml.codex/agents/deep-review-project-checklist.toml.codex/agents/deep-review-python.toml.codex/agents/deep-review-qa.toml.codex/agents/deep-review-security.toml.codex/agents/deep-review-simplification.toml.codex/agents/deep-review-typescript.toml.codex/agents/deep-review-unit-test.tomlCLAUDE.mdREADME.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .agents/skills/deep-review-next
- .agents/skills/deep-review
Owner
Author
|
Fixed CodeRabbit inline comment in 9cd4473. |
7 tasks
This was referenced May 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
deep-reviewtodeep-review-lite.deep-review-nexttodeep-review-pro.Closes #435
Contributes to #436
Note
#435 still references the S7/#434 gate. This PR implements the rename now per maintainer instruction in the fix session; #434 remains open.
Test plan
rgscan returns no matches fordeep-review-next, olddeep-reviewskill paths, or rollout/promotion wording.find .agents/skills -maxdepth 1 -type l ...reports no broken Codex skill symlinks.test -f .agents/skills/deep-review-lite/SKILL.mdtest -f .agents/skills/deep-review-pro/SKILL.mdjq empty .claude/settings.jsongit diff --checkgit diff --cached --checknpx prettier --check ...passes for the changed Markdown and JSON files.HEAD^passes andHEAD^contains the pre-renamedeep-review/deep-review-nextpaths.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores