Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Anomaly performance on NAB in TM to match BacktrackingTM #391

Open
breznak opened this issue Apr 10, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Improve Anomaly performance on NAB in TM to match BacktrackingTM #391

breznak opened this issue Apr 10, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@breznak
Copy link
Member

breznak commented Apr 10, 2019

As BackTM was removed, #95 #327 ,
its only advantage was performance on anomaly detection, from test NAB:

[BackTM] Outperforms the regular Temporal Memory on the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark (NAB) by ~5%. There are 3 scores for NAB, all of which have a maximum of 100.

BacktrackingTM: 70.1 	63.1 	74.3
RegularTM:	64.6 	58.8 	69.6

We should:

@breznak
Copy link
Member Author

breznak commented Aug 1, 2019

The game is ON now. Our HTM is able to be ran as a part of the NAB now, there's an issue with our scores htm-community/NAB#15 but we should resolve that. Then all anomaly-related changes here should be tested on NAB with the goal of improving the performance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant