Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Read linked files with only warnings rather than errors #920

Open
3 tasks done
oruebel opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks done

[Feature]: Read linked files with only warnings rather than errors #920

oruebel opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
category: enhancement improvements of code or code behavior help wanted: deep dive request for community contributions that will involve many parts of the code base priority: medium non-critical problem and/or affecting only a small set of users
Milestone

Comments

@oruebel
Copy link
Contributor

oruebel commented Jul 27, 2023

What would you like to see added to HDMF?

It would be nice to be able to read files that are created by linking with only warnings rather than errors, when one of the files is missing, for example. For example, sharing a file with only processed data to others and they can still read the files, rather than they only have to also download the raw files that tend to be big.

This issue has been originally filed by @tuanpham96 in PyNWB#1742. Transferring this issue here since this will need to be addressed in HDMF.

Is your feature request related to a problem?

No response

What solution would you like?

When loading in a file that's supposed to link to an external file that is missing, the I/O backend should just throw warnings as MISSING data and still allow users to read the data inside that file. For missing data, this could possibly be to return a DataIO wrapper for missing data. This may not be trivial in cases where the data is required on read (e.g, if an init of a container does error checking).

Do you have any interest in helping implement the feature?

Yes.

Code of Conduct

@oruebel oruebel added category: enhancement improvements of code or code behavior help wanted: deep dive request for community contributions that will involve many parts of the code base priority: medium non-critical problem and/or affecting only a small set of users labels Jul 27, 2023
@oruebel oruebel added this to the Future milestone Jul 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: enhancement improvements of code or code behavior help wanted: deep dive request for community contributions that will involve many parts of the code base priority: medium non-critical problem and/or affecting only a small set of users
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants