Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_service_plan doesn't implement P0V3 as a valid sku_name #21879

Closed
1 task done
troyha opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
1 task done

azurerm_service_plan doesn't implement P0V3 as a valid sku_name #21879

troyha opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@troyha
Copy link

troyha commented May 22, 2023

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

Implement P0V3 as a valid App Service Plan sku_name . This sku is very economical in comparison to Standard and older Premium versions on Linux and I see no reason why anyone would choose Standard with this sku available.

There is an Azure bug which is apparently being fixed with an ETA rollout end of June which may affect this being implemented. I reported an issue (referenced below) so if it does affect the implementation, then once this is fixed it would be nice to have this sku added to TF.

New or Affected Resource(s)/Data Source(s)

azurerm_service_plan

Potential Terraform Configuration

resource "azurerm_service_plan" "example" {
  name                = "example"
  resource_group_name = azurerm_resource_group.example.name
  location            = azurerm_resource_group.example.location
  os_type             = "Linux"
  sku_name            = "P0v3"
}

References

Azure/azure-cli#26498

@aristosvo
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @troyha! Thanks for raising this.

This should work AFAIK, but it is not documented properly when I added the SKUs (#21371).

@troyha
Copy link
Author

troyha commented May 22, 2023

I was about to update with the Actions error "Error: expected sku_name to be one of [B1 B2 B3 S1 S2 S3 P1v2 P2v2 P3v2 P1v3 P2v3 P3v3 Y1 EP1 EP2 EP3 F1 I1 I2 I3 I1v2 I2v2 I3v2 D1 SHARED WS1 WS2 WS3], got P0V3" that I'm getting and found an existing issue when I searched this specific error

@troyha troyha closed this as completed May 22, 2023
@troyha troyha closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 22, 2023
Copy link

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 26, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants