Skip to content

Conversation

@finnigja
Copy link

Removing this repo-specific CodeQL scanning workflow, as we're getting equivalent coverage of this repo from the centralized scanning setup.

@finnigja finnigja requested a review from picatz April 10, 2023 23:32
@picatz
Copy link

picatz commented Apr 11, 2023

cc @nywilken this should be applied to the v2 branch, effectively following up on #297

@picatz picatz merged commit c12e42f into main Apr 11, 2023
@picatz picatz deleted the remove_codeql_workflow branch April 11, 2023 15:18
@nywilken
Copy link
Contributor

cc @nywilken this should be applied to the v2 branch, effectively following up on #297

@picatz this makes sense to me. I'll open a PR for it, shortly.

nywilken pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2023
remove repo-specific codeql action, in favor of centralized job
nywilken added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2023
remove repo-specific codeql action, in favor of centralized job

Co-authored-by: Kent 'picat' Gruber <kent@hashicorp.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants