Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some MerkleDb unit tests take too long to run #10405

Open
11 tasks
artemananiev opened this issue Dec 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
11 tasks

Some MerkleDb unit tests take too long to run #10405

artemananiev opened this issue Dec 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Good First Issue Either a small change or a medium change concentrated in a single component. hacktoberfest Issues shown by lists for the Hacktoberfest and made for newcomers to do the first contribution. Platform Data Structures Platform Tickets pertaining to the platform Tech Debt Reduced Issues which reduce technical debt. Test Development Test Development

Comments

@artemananiev
Copy link
Member

artemananiev commented Dec 9, 2023

🆕🐥 First Timers Only

This issue is reserved for people who have never contributed to Hedera or any open source project in general.
We know that creating a pull request (PR) is a major barrier for new contributors.
The goal of this issue and all other issues labeled by 'good first issue' is to help you make your first contribution to Hedera.

👾 Description of the issue

I ran a clean build (./gradlew clean; ./gradlew build) locally, it took 12 mins, out of which more than 4 mins were spent in :swirlds-merkledb:test:

> Task :swirlds-merkledb:test
  739 passing (4m 5s)

In particular, HalfDiskVirtualKeySetTest took a minute or so, and there were a couple more slow tests. Some of the tests are named "hammer test", which indicates they should be tagged appropriately, but they aren't:

    @Tags({@Tag(TestTypeTags.HAMMER), @Tag(TestQualifierTags.TIME_CONSUMING)})

📋 Step by step guide to do a contribution

If you have never contributed to an open source project at GitHub, the following step-by-step guide will introduce you to the workflow. More information and concrete samples for shell commands for each step can be found in our CONTRIBUTING.md file.
A more detailed general documentation of the GitHub PR workflow can be found here.

  • Claim this issue: Comment below that you are interested in working on the issue
  • Wait for assignment: A community member with the given rights will add you as an assignee of the issue
  • Fork the repository: You can do that in GitHub (by simply clicking the 'fork' button).
  • Check out the forked repository
  • Create a feature branch for the issue. We do not have a hard naming definition for branches but it is best practice to prefix the branch name with the issue id.
  • Solve the issue in your branch.
  • Commit your changes: Here, it is needed to add sign-off information to the commit to accept the "Developer Certificate of Origin" (https://developercertificate.org). More details can be found in our CONTRIBUTING.md
  • Start a Pull Request (PR): We have a pattern for naming pull requests that a GitHub Action checks. We use that pattern to support the creation of automatic release notes.
  • Check GitHub Actions: Several GitHub Actions will be triggered automatically for each PR. If a GitHub Action fails and you do not understand the cause of that error do not hesitate to add a comment to the PR and ask the Hedera developer community for support.
  • Wait for reviews: Members of the Hedera developer community will review your PR. If a reviewer finds any missing pieces or a problem, he or she will start a discussion with you and describe the next steps for solving the problem.
  • You did it 🎉: We will merge the fix in the develop branch. Thanks for being part of the Hedera community as an open-source contributor ❤️

🎉 Contribute to Hacktoberfest

Solve this issue as part of the Hacktoberfest event and get a chance to receive cool goodies like a T-Shirt. 🎽

🤔 Additional Information

If you have any questions, just ask us directly in this issue by adding a comment. You can join our community chat at Discord. A general manual about open-source contributions can be found here.

@artemananiev artemananiev added Test Development Test Development Good First Issue Either a small change or a medium change concentrated in a single component. Platform Data Structures labels Dec 9, 2023
@poulok poulok added Platform Tickets pertaining to the platform Tech Debt Reduced Issues which reduce technical debt. labels Jun 4, 2024
@hendrikebbers hendrikebbers added good first issue candidate Issues that can become a good first issue but need more description/context. and removed Good First Issue Either a small change or a medium change concentrated in a single component. labels Aug 28, 2024
@hendrikebbers hendrikebbers added Good First Issue Either a small change or a medium change concentrated in a single component. hacktoberfest Issues shown by lists for the Hacktoberfest and made for newcomers to do the first contribution. and removed good first issue candidate Issues that can become a good first issue but need more description/context. labels Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Good First Issue Either a small change or a medium change concentrated in a single component. hacktoberfest Issues shown by lists for the Hacktoberfest and made for newcomers to do the first contribution. Platform Data Structures Platform Tickets pertaining to the platform Tech Debt Reduced Issues which reduce technical debt. Test Development Test Development
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants