Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CIWE: Update release workflow to use semantic release tools #133

Closed
Tracked by #131
nathanklick opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #136
Closed
Tracked by #131

CIWE: Update release workflow to use semantic release tools #133

nathanklick opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #136
Assignees
Labels
Feature Enhancement Enhancing an existing feature driven by business requirements. Typically backwards compatible. released
Milestone

Comments

@nathanklick
Copy link
Member

nathanklick commented Jun 28, 2023

Description

In practice and actual testing we have found the cz changelog tool does not properly handle semantic versions correctly. This facilitates the need to change our choice of tooling to the semantic-release tool chain.

@nathanklick nathanklick added the Feature Enhancement Enhancing an existing feature driven by business requirements. Typically backwards compatible. label Jun 28, 2023
@nathanklick nathanklick added this to the v0.2.0 milestone Jun 28, 2023
@nathanklick nathanklick moved this to 🏗 In progress in FST Suite Jun 28, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏗 In progress to ✅ Done in FST Suite Jun 30, 2023
@swirlds-automation
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.2.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Enhancement Enhancing an existing feature driven by business requirements. Typically backwards compatible. released
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants