You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#7805 adds support for using constant bounds inference to perform instruction selection on x86, HVX, and WASM. It works for small tests, but might be more powerful if we track a scope of constant bounds while traversing the Expr AST for codegen. This is just a tracking issue for that TODO.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, the main reason I don't just add it to #7805 is that I suspect it would be best to only track "useful" expression bounds (especially because bounds are currently useless for anything other than saturating narrow instructions), and it feels a waste to keep a scope around + compute constant bounds for every single expression during codegen.
Will be fixed in #8155 , which makes cheap constant bounds available in codegen and uses it for a handful of things. Still no tracking through let / letstmts though (it should probably be done lazily)
#7805 adds support for using constant bounds inference to perform instruction selection on x86, HVX, and WASM. It works for small tests, but might be more powerful if we track a scope of constant bounds while traversing the Expr AST for codegen. This is just a tracking issue for that TODO.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: