You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As the title says, replacing k=4 by k=1 and keeping the rest of the code untouched allows the quality of the generated handwritten digits to be two or three times better.
By the way it seems that k=1 is the value used in the original paper experiments :
The number of steps to apply to the discriminator, k, is a hyperparameter. We used k = 1, the least expensive option, in our experiments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
romain-rsr
changed the title
switching k=4 to k=1 allow to generate images of WAY better quality
switching k=4 to k=1 allows to generate images of WAY better quality
Apr 2, 2021
Hi,
As the title says, replacing k=4 by k=1 and keeping the rest of the code untouched allows the quality of the generated handwritten digits to be two or three times better.
By the way it seems that k=1 is the value used in the original paper experiments :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: