Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chicago (RTA): searching for an address doesn't work #783

Open
bcskillings opened this issue Sep 18, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Chicago (RTA): searching for an address doesn't work #783

bcskillings opened this issue Sep 18, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
bug 🐞 A functional defect or unexpected behavior. upstream 🏞️ Related to an upstream issue.

Comments

@bcskillings
Copy link

bcskillings commented Sep 18, 2021

I am unable to search for an address while using the fdroid version for Chicago (RTA). This includes adding home/work addresses and directions. GPS does properly recognize my location, so the starting address for directions is filled, but destination cannot be added.

@ialokim ialokim added bug 🐞 A functional defect or unexpected behavior. upstream 🏞️ Related to an upstream issue. labels Nov 7, 2021
@swonky
Copy link

swonky commented Dec 14, 2021

I have the exact same issue issue in Melbourne, Australia. Fdroid version.

@TheRealRWJ
Copy link

Same issue in NL

Errormessage:

de.schildbach.pte.exception.NotFoundException: https://api.9292.nl/0.1/journeys?lang=nl-NL&from=50.95504%2C5.82344&to=50.982758%2C5.845288&searchType=departure&dateTime=2022-02-03T0107&sequence=1&realtime=true&before=1&after=5&interchangeTime=standard&byBus=true&byTrain=true&bySubway=true&byTram=true&byFerry=true
de.schildbach.pte.util.HttpClient.getInputStream(HttpClient.java:286)
de.schildbach.pte.util.HttpClient.get(HttpClient.java:205)
de.schildbach.pte.util.HttpClient.get(HttpClient.java:198)

Als je deze fout wilt rapporteren, doe dat dan naar public-transport-enabler.

@rvgool
Copy link

rvgool commented Feb 13, 2022

Same issue in NL

Errormessage:

de.schildbach.pte.exception.NotFoundException: https://api.9292.nl/0.1/journeys?lang=nl-NL&from=50.95504%2C5.82344&to=50.982758%2C5.845288&searchType=departure&dateTime=2022-02-03T0107&sequence=1&realtime=true&before=1&after=5&interchangeTime=standard&byBus=true&byTrain=true&bySubway=true&byTram=true&byFerry=true de.schildbach.pte.util.HttpClient.getInputStream(HttpClient.java:286) de.schildbach.pte.util.HttpClient.get(HttpClient.java:205) de.schildbach.pte.util.HttpClient.get(HttpClient.java:198)

Als je deze fout wilt rapporteren, doe dat dan naar public-transport-enabler.

This is for data from the NS source. With 9292.nl source selected locations are not suggested and can't be used.

@Altonss
Copy link
Collaborator

Altonss commented Dec 7, 2023

Well lets split this issue into several parts, because each issue is specific to one network:

  1. Chicago: For @bcskillings, indeed Chicago(RTA) search also seems broken to me, let's dedicate this issue to this problem
  2. Melbourne: For @swonky this is a duplicate of Melbourne Australia  #767.
  3. NL with 9292.nl API: For @TheRealRWJ this problem is being discussed in 9292 provider returns no stops in the Netherlands #881 so let's keep there. A temporary fix has been decided, to disable this network temporarily, see Fix, remove and disable several regions #884.

So let's keep this issue open, but keep it specific to the Chicago (RTA) search bug :)

@Altonss Altonss changed the title Searching for an address doesn't work Chicago (RTA): searching for an address doesn't work Dec 7, 2023
@js5253
Copy link

js5253 commented Jun 18, 2024

It seems like the RTA's trip planner, used by this app at https://tripplanner.rtachicago.com/ccg3 has long stopped working, and the closest thing (the CTA website) just tells people to use Google Maps.

Is there a different API that could be used to get routes?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug 🐞 A functional defect or unexpected behavior. upstream 🏞️ Related to an upstream issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants