Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please render natural=shingle in river #3894

Open
ghost opened this issue Sep 20, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Please render natural=shingle in river #3894

ghost opened this issue Sep 20, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 20, 2019

Currently, areas of natural=sand in a river are rendered, but areas of natural=shingle aren't. That's not consistent. Could you please render natural=shingle in a river, too?

Untitled

Screenshot is from here.

@jeisenbe
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for mentioning this. We have recently been discussing how to render areas of bare_rock in the intertidal zone and in rivers, and natural=shingle is also another feature that could be shown in the same way.

Note that natural=beach with surface= currently renders the pattern above water areas, but I agree that not all areas of shingle along a river can be tagged as natural=beach

(Also natural=sand should not render above water. Areas of sand formed by moving water along rivers, lakes and seas should be tagged natural=beach)

Related issues: #3707, #3840, #3864, #3877 and especially #3854
Related PRs: #3855 and #3851

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 9, 2019

I'm unsure whether areas of shingle or sand at a river borders can be considered beaches because they often have a very different shape than areas of shingle or sand at lakes or seas due to the lateral instead of a vertical movement of the water. Example (location):

Untitled

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant