-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
align return types from execution and subscription #3620
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for compassionate-pike-271cb3 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
yaacovCR
added
the
PR: breaking change 💥
implementation requires increase of "major" version number
label
May 31, 2022
yaacovCR
force-pushed
the
align
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 7, 2022 07:45
a735422
to
b0e56f2
Compare
yaacovCR
added a commit
to yaacovCR/graphql-js
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2022
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both `subscribe` and `createSourceEventStream`. This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common `subscribeWithBadFn` function. For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a `Promise<ExecutionResult>` rather than a `Promise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>`). Because the `subscribeFn` is expected to be "bad," an `AsyncGenerator` should never be returned. If a valid `subscribeFn` is mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered. extracted from graphql#3620
yaacovCR
force-pushed
the
align
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 7, 2022 10:17
d89e2de
to
7f214ea
Compare
yaacovCR
force-pushed
the
align
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 7, 2022 11:40
2321ee8
to
3b27fb6
Compare
IvanGoncharov
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2022
Two test groups use essentially the same logic to set up a subscription with an improper subscribeFn, testing both `subscribe` and `createSourceEventStream`. This PR extracts the duplicated logic into a single common `subscribeWithBadFn` function. For convenience, the common function is typed to appropriately return a `Promise<ExecutionResult>` rather than a `Promise<ExecutionResult | AsyncGenerator<...>>`). Because the `subscribeFn` is expected to be "bad," an `AsyncGenerator` should never be returned. If a valid `subscribeFn` is mistakenly passed, an assertion failure is triggered. extracted from #3620
with respect to possible promises
@IvanGoncharov @graphql/graphql-js-reviewers This has been rebased and is re-ready for review. |
= remove unnecessary waits = simply subscribeWithBadFn
until it is asserted as eventStream
See further discussion with respect to advantages of using repeaters about general anti pattern of |
This was referenced Jun 5, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
with respect to possible promises
motivations:
subscribe
workflow intoexecute