Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ManyToMany through model handling via edges #970

Open
Eraldo opened this issue May 23, 2020 · 8 comments
Open

ManyToMany through model handling via edges #970

Eraldo opened this issue May 23, 2020 · 8 comments

Comments

@Eraldo
Copy link

Eraldo commented May 23, 2020

Reopening with reference to: graphql-python/graphene#83

To quote @adamcharnock from graphql-python/graphene#83

When a DjangoConnectionField traverses a many-to-many field it would be nice to have the option to expose the fields of any through-table on the edges of the relationship.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 27, 2020

Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Aug 27, 2020
@artdiev
Copy link

artdiev commented Sep 9, 2020

Still an issue. No reason to not automatically pull the fields from the "through" model

@zbyte64
Copy link
Collaborator

zbyte64 commented Sep 18, 2020

I think this is a solid request, I'd help anyone who wants to write a PR.

@meshelton
Copy link

meshelton commented Feb 3, 2021

@zbyte64 I'd love to help submit a PR for this one if you could walk me through where to start looking

@he0119
Copy link

he0119 commented Mar 7, 2021

Any updates on this?

@MisterGlass
Copy link
Contributor

Could really use this

@liang-cicada
Copy link

Any updates on this?

1 similar comment
@Candlend
Copy link

Any updates on this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants