Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Continuous fuzzing by way of OSS-Fuzz #409

Open
DavidKorczynski opened this issue Jul 4, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Continuous fuzzing by way of OSS-Fuzz #409

DavidKorczynski opened this issue Jul 4, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@DavidKorczynski
Copy link

Hi,

I was wondering if you would like to integrate continuous fuzzing by way of OSS-Fuzz? Fuzzing is a way to automate test-case generation and has been heavily used for memory unsafe languages. Recently efforts have been put into fuzzing memory safe languages and Python is one of the languages where it would be great to use fuzzing.

In this google/oss-fuzz#7943 I did an initial integration into OSS-Fuzz. OSS-Fuzz is a free service run by Google that performs continuous fuzzing of important open source projects. Since this is also a Google project you should be able to reach out internally e.g. to the Google Open Source Security team (GOSST) if you have any questions.

If you would like to integrate, the only thing I need is a list of email(s) that will get access to the data produced by OSS-Fuzz, such as bug reports, coverage reports and more stats. Notice the emails affiliated with the project will be public in the OSS-Fuzz repo, as they will be part of a configuration file.

@DavidKorczynski DavidKorczynski changed the title Continuous fuzzing by way of OSS-Fuz Continuous fuzzing by way of OSS-Fuzz Jul 4, 2022
@parthea parthea added the type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. label Jul 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants