Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Marking all remaining versions as "dev". #4299

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2017

Conversation

dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

@dhermes dhermes commented Oct 31, 2017

This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code that relies on a new feature (e.g. of google-api-core) will then be able to explicitly make this clear by using the lower bound of the devN version.

Fixes #4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/

This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code
that relies on a **new** feature (e.g. of `google-api-core`) will
then be able to **explicitly** make this clear by using the
lower bound of the `devN` version.

Fixes googleapis#4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Oct 31, 2017
@dhermes dhermes merged commit 57d7fd7 into googleapis:master Oct 31, 2017
@dhermes dhermes deleted the devN-everyone branch October 31, 2017 22:43
@duggelz
Copy link

duggelz commented Nov 1, 2017

Can we document this in a README or something? Also, is the whole release process documented somewhere (since I'll want to release opencensus-python soon and hope to shamelessly copy the google-cloud-python process)?

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Nov 1, 2017

Can we document this in a README or something?

I think the CONTRIBUTING.rst is the right place?

is the whole release process documented somewhere (since I'll want to release opencensus-python soon and hope to shamelessly copy the google-cloud-python process)?

Not really (but maybe a little bit in CONTRIBUTING.rst?). It's mostly done by our scripts, which can detect when a tag has been pushed and manually parse the version from the tag.

I am happy to chat about packaging "things to care about" if you like Doug.

atulep pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2023
This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code
that relies on a **new** feature (e.g. of `google-api-core`) will
then be able to **explicitly** make this clear by using the
lower bound of the `devN` version.

Fixes #4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/
atulep pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2023
This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code
that relies on a **new** feature (e.g. of `google-api-core`) will
then be able to **explicitly** make this clear by using the
lower bound of the `devN` version.

Fixes #4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2023
This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code
that relies on a **new** feature (e.g. of `google-api-core`) will
then be able to **explicitly** make this clear by using the
lower bound of the `devN` version.

Fixes #4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code
that relies on a **new** feature (e.g. of `google-api-core`) will
then be able to **explicitly** make this clear by using the
lower bound of the `devN` version.

Fixes #4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2023
This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code
that relies on a **new** feature (e.g. of `google-api-core`) will
then be able to **explicitly** make this clear by using the
lower bound of the `devN` version.

Fixes #4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2023
This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code
that relies on a **new** feature (e.g. of `google-api-core`) will
then be able to **explicitly** make this clear by using the
lower bound of the `devN` version.

Fixes #4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2023
This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code
that relies on a **new** feature (e.g. of `google-api-core`) will
then be able to **explicitly** make this clear by using the
lower bound of the `devN` version.

Fixes #4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2023
This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code
that relies on a **new** feature (e.g. of `google-api-core`) will
then be able to **explicitly** make this clear by using the
lower bound of the `devN` version.

Fixes #4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code
that relies on a **new** feature (e.g. of `google-api-core`) will
then be able to **explicitly** make this clear by using the
lower bound of the `devN` version.

Fixes #4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2023
This is to make it clear the code is between releases. Any code
that relies on a **new** feature (e.g. of `google-api-core`) will
then be able to **explicitly** make this clear by using the
lower bound of the `devN` version.

Fixes #4208.

See: https://snarky.ca/how-i-manage-package-version-numbers/
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. packaging
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants