Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

profile: avoid string(int) conversion #513

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2020

Conversation

smasher164
Copy link
Contributor

As per the vet check being introduced in 1.15
(golang/go#32479), conversions of the form
string(int) are flagged by go vet. The suggested fix is to instead use
string(rune).

Additionally, since google/pprof is vendored into the go tree, we avoid
test failures from vet flagging this dependency (see
CL https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220977).

As per the vet check being introduced in 1.15
(golang/go#32479), conversions of the form
string(int) are flagged by go vet. The suggested fix is to instead use
string(rune).

Additionally, since google/pprof is vendored into the go tree, we avoid
test failures from vet flagging this dependency (see
CL https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220977).
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #513 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #513   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.06%   67.06%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines        7611     7611           
=======================================
  Hits         5104     5104           
  Misses       2103     2103           
  Partials      404      404
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
profile/proto.go 83.25% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d9cc468...6cfaca7. Read the comment docs.

@aalexand aalexand merged commit 4ac0da8 into google:master Feb 26, 2020
@smasher164 smasher164 deleted the stringintconv branch February 26, 2020 09:26
giordano added a commit to JuliaPackaging/Yggdrasil that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2020
* Update pprof to latest revision

Bump from 20191205061153 => 20201109224723

My personal interest is to pull in google/pprof#564, which adds support for displaying names with `"` in them, which julia functions sometimes have (e.g. `var"#foo#23"`)

Includes:
- google/pprof#564
- google/pprof#575
- google/pprof#574
- google/pprof#571
- google/pprof#572
- google/pprof#570
- google/pprof#562
- google/pprof#561
- google/pprof#565
- google/pprof#560
- google/pprof#563
- google/pprof#557
- google/pprof#554
- google/pprof#552
- google/pprof#545
- google/pprof#549
- google/pprof#547
- google/pprof#541
- google/pprof#534
- google/pprof#542
- google/pprof#535
- google/pprof#531
- google/pprof#530
- google/pprof#528
- google/pprof#522
- google/pprof#525
- google/pprof#527
- google/pprof#519
- google/pprof#520
- google/pprof#517
- google/pprof#518
- google/pprof#514
- google/pprof#513
- google/pprof#510
- google/pprof#508
- google/pprof#506
- google/pprof#509
- google/pprof#504

* Update P/pprof/build_tarballs.jl - use a real version number

Co-authored-by: Mosè Giordano <giordano@users.noreply.github.com>

* Remove now unused `timestamp`

* [pprof] Use `GitSource`

Co-authored-by: Mosè Giordano <giordano@users.noreply.github.com>
gmarin13 pushed a commit to gmarin13/pprof that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2020
As per the vet check being introduced in 1.15
(golang/go#32479), conversions of the form
string(int) are flagged by go vet. The suggested fix is to instead use
string(rune).

Additionally, since google/pprof is vendored into the go tree, we avoid
test failures from vet flagging this dependency (see
CL https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220977).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants