Clarify "Times() after X" error message

The previous error message could be misinterpreted to mean that `Times` could not be
used in combination with `WillRepeatedly`, when in fact the call to `Times` just needs to happen *first*.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 410070405
Change-Id: I747d34a4334cf2e56d589dcad3a08a8f322d77c8

Author: cramertj

googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc

@@ -264,10 +264,10 @@ void ExpectationBase::UntypedTimes(const Cardinality& a_cardinality) {
                        ".Times() cannot appear "
                        "more than once in an EXPECT_CALL().");
   } else {
-    ExpectSpecProperty(last_clause_ < kTimes,
-                       ".Times() cannot appear after "
-                       ".InSequence(), .WillOnce(), .WillRepeatedly(), "
-                       "or .RetiresOnSaturation().");
+    ExpectSpecProperty(
+        last_clause_ < kTimes,
+        ".Times() may only appear *before* .InSequence(), .WillOnce(), "
+        ".WillRepeatedly(), or .RetiresonSaturation(), not after.");
   }
   last_clause_ = kTimes;
 

googlemock/test/gmock-spec-builders_test.cc

@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ TEST(ExpectCallSyntaxTest, TimesMustBeBeforeInSequence) {
     EXPECT_CALL(a, DoA(1))
         .InSequence(s)
         .Times(1);
-  }, ".Times() cannot appear after ");
+  }, ".Times() may only appear *before* ");
 
   a.DoA(1);
 }