Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/tools/gopls: Highlight: nil deref panic on CompositeLiteral with no type #68918

Closed
adonovan opened this issue Aug 16, 2024 · 11 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
gopls Issues related to the Go language server, gopls. NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. Tools This label describes issues relating to any tools in the x/tools repository.
Milestone

Comments

@adonovan
Copy link
Member

/Users/adonovan/go/bin/gopls: devel go1.24-760b722c34 Fri Aug 9 14:54:31 2024 +0000
	path	golang.org/x/tools/gopls
	mod	golang.org/x/tools/gopls	(devel)	
	dep	github.com/BurntSushi/toml	v1.2.1	
	dep	github.com/google/go-cmp	v0.6.0	
	dep	golang.org/x/exp/typeparams	v0.0.0-20221212164502-fae10dda9338	
	dep	golang.org/x/mod	v0.20.0	
	dep	golang.org/x/sync	v0.8.0	
	dep	golang.org/x/telemetry	v0.0.0-20240712210958-268b4a8ec2d7	
	dep	golang.org/x/text	v0.17.0	
	dep	golang.org/x/tools	v0.21.1-0.20240508182429-e35e4ccd0d2d
	=>	../	(devel)	
	
	dep	golang.org/x/vuln	v1.0.4	
	dep	honnef.co/go/tools	v0.4.7	
	dep	mvdan.cc/gofumpt	v0.6.0	
	dep	mvdan.cc/xurls/v2	v2.5.0	
...
	build	vcs.revision=7cc3be7d11326f7aa5fc7a51166590788049d072
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x2 addr=0x20 pc=0x100b57bb4]

goroutine 101 gp=0x14000602700 m=6 mp=0x14000500008 [running]:
panic({0x100ff4840?, 0x1017acf00?})
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/runtime/panic.go:804 +0x154 fp=0x140050f8ba0 sp=0x140050f8af0 pc=0x100336bc4
runtime.panicmem(...)
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/runtime/panic.go:262
runtime.sigpanic()
runtime.sigpanic()
e[16:00:36.275]   <-- textDocument/hover[4] {"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{"contents":{"kind":"plaintext","value":"func (Node) Common() *Common"},"range":{"start":{"line":144,"character":15},"end":{"line":144,"character":21}}},"id":4}
i[16:00:36.275] anxious continuation to 4 can't run, held up by (6)
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/runtime/signal_unix.go:900 +0x300 fp=0x140050f8c00 sp=0x140050f8ba0 pc=0x100339060
golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/golang.highlightIdentifier.func3({0x10112a448?, 0x14003074480})
	/Users/adonovan/w/xtools/gopls/internal/golang/highlight.go:562 +0x264 fp=0x140050f8cc0 sp=0x140050f8c10 pc=0x100b57bb4
go/ast.inspector.Visit(0x140009c8440, {0x10112a448?, 0x14003074480?})
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/go/ast/walk.go:361 +0x38 fp=0x140050f8ce0 sp=0x140050f8cc0 pc=0x100648638
go/ast.Walk({0x101125e80?, 0x140009c8440?}, {0x10112a448, 0x14003074480})
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/go/ast/walk.go:34 +0x44 fp=0x140050f8e50 sp=0x140050f8ce0 pc=0x100645404
go/ast.Walk({0x101125e80?, 0x140009c8440?}, {0x10112a5b0, 0x14004270740})
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/go/ast/walk.go:127 +0x1db4 fp=0x140050f8fc0 sp=0x140050f8e50 pc=0x100647174
go/ast.walkList[...](...)
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/go/ast/walk.go:21
go/ast.Walk({0x101125e80?, 0x140009c8440?}, {0x10112a808, 0x140030744c0})
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/go/ast/walk.go:194 +0x2884 fp=0x140050f9130 sp=0x140050f8fc0 pc=0x100647c44
go/ast.walkList[...](...)
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/go/ast/walk.go:21
go/ast.Walk({0x101125e80?, 0x140009c8440?}, {0x10112a420, 0x1400426fdd0})
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/go/ast/walk.go:211 +0x2978 fp=0x140050f92a0 sp=0x140050f9130 pc=0x100647d38
go/ast.Walk({0x101125e80?, 0x140009c8440?}, {0x10112aab0, 0x1400426fe00})
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/go/ast/walk.go:332 +0xd78 fp=0x140050f9410 sp=0x140050f92a0 pc=0x100646138
go/ast.walkList[...](...)
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/go/ast/walk.go:21
go/ast.Walk({0x101125e80?, 0x140009c8440?}, {0x101129958, 0x1400410ea00})
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/go/ast/walk.go:341 +0x2d88 fp=0x140050f9580 sp=0x140050f9410 pc=0x100648148
go/ast.Inspect(...)
	/Users/adonovan/w/goroot/src/go/ast/walk.go:372
golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/golang.highlightIdentifier(0x1400426c280, 0x1400410ea00, 0x14000635da0, 0x140037206c0)
	/Users/adonovan/w/xtools/gopls/internal/golang/highlight.go:540 +0x208 fp=0x140050f95d0 sp=0x140050f9580 pc=0x100b57918
golang.org/x/tools/gopls/internal/golang.highlightPath({0x140040ba300, 0xe, 0x10}, 0x1400410ea00, 0x14000635da0)
	/Users/adonovan/w/xtools/gopls/internal/golang/highlight.go:106 +0x280 fp=0x140050f9650 sp=0x140050f95d0 pc=0x100b555b0
@gopherbot gopherbot added Tools This label describes issues relating to any tools in the x/tools repository. gopls Issues related to the Go language server, gopls. labels Aug 16, 2024
@gopherbot gopherbot added this to the Unreleased milestone Aug 16, 2024
@adonovan
Copy link
Member Author

This appears to be a recent regression caused by https://go.dev/cl/597675.

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/606535 mentions this issue: gopls/internal/golang: make sure CompositeLit node is non-nil

@findleyr findleyr modified the milestones: Unreleased, gopls/v0.17.0 Aug 20, 2024
@findleyr findleyr added NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done. NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. and removed NeedsFix The path to resolution is known, but the work has not been done. labels Aug 26, 2024
@adonovan
Copy link
Member Author

I've been trying all week to come up with a good repro for this, but to no avail. What I have found is that it consistently crashes in an if-statement that has been misparsed as a CompositeLit:

						if decl.Tok == token.CONST {  <---- this "{" is the start of a CompositeLit with no Type
							info.declare(id, &Const{    <-- the declare call is Elt[0] of the CompositeLit
								symbol: symbol{
									block: block,
									name:  id.Name,
								},
								expr: lazye,
							})
						} else { <----this "}" is the end of the lit

However, the edits I was making were about 1000 lines up the file (e.g. an extra "}" inserted by mistake) so it looks like a cascading failure of parser recovery. (Nonetheless, the CompositeLiteral should have a type.)

@adonovan
Copy link
Member Author

Yay, I have a deterministic repro of the crash using the gopls CLI. Unfortunately the file is very large and nonpublic so I will need to bisect it down a bit first.

@adonovan
Copy link
Member Author

OK, I reduced it from about 2000 lines to around 1KB by manual bisection and some lucky guesses. (The result is a total mess, but that's not the point.)

Write this file into /tmp/a.go:

package p

func f() {
	constant. MakeFromLiteral(e.Valuelit string, 

	case *ast.ArrayType:
		if e.Len != nil {
			mlen, _, klen := f(info, ictx, e.Len, env)
			if mlen != ValueMode || klen == nil || klen.Kind() != constant.Int {
			if mlen != ValueMode || klen == nil || klen.Kind() != constant.Int {
			}
		} else {
		}
	}
}

func g(info *Info, block *Block, stmt ast.Stmt) {
	if stmt, ok := stmt.(*ast.AssignStmt); ok && stmt.Tok == token.DEFINE {
		for i, lhs := range stmt.Lhs {
		}
	}
}

and run this command:

$ gopls highlight /tmp/a.go:#462

to trigger the panic. That offset corresponds to the lhs ident in the final for loop, which, according to the types playground, has this enclosing path (along with a huge cascade of parse and type errors):

[0] *ast.Ident @ 19:10-19:13 (#460-463)
[1] *ast.CompositeLit @ 18:59-0:0 (#436-0)
[2] *ast.BinaryExpr @ 18:47-0:0 (#424-0)
[3] *ast.BinaryExpr @ 18:41-0:0 (#418-0)
[4] *ast.CallExpr @ 4:2-0:0 (#23-0)
[5] *ast.ExprStmt @ 4:2-0:0 (#23-0)
[6] *ast.BlockStmt @ 3:10-0:0 (#20-0)
[7] *ast.FuncDecl @ 3:1-0:0 (#11-0) Type.Scope={}
[8] *ast.File @ 1:1-0:0 (#0-0) Scope={}

Poking around in the types playground reveals what a fascinating mess the parser makes of this input. The malformed MakeFromLiteral call on line 6 seems to have a subtree that is a BinaryExpr (the final &&), which suggests that && stmt.Tok == token.DEFINE {...} is being parsed as an expression outside of an if-statement context where the "{" would indicate a BodyStmt; instead it looks like a CompositeLit of a bogus type.

@findleyr
Copy link
Member

findleyr commented Aug 27, 2024

Even smaller minification:

package p
var _ = g(if c { { lhs

From types playground:

Pretty-printed:
g(BadExpr, c{{lhs}})

Syntax:
0 *ast.CallExpr {
1 . Fun: *ast.Ident {
2 . . NamePos: play.go:3:9
3 . . Name: "g"
4 . . Obj: nil
5 . }
6 . Lparen: play.go:3:10
7 . Args: []ast.Expr (len = 2) {
8 . . 0: *ast.BadExpr {
9 . . . From: play.go:3:11
10 . . . To: play.go:3:11
11 . . }
12 . . 1: *ast.CompositeLit {
13 . . . Type: *ast.Ident {
14 . . . . NamePos: play.go:3:14
15 . . . . Name: "c"
16 . . . . Obj: nil
17 . . . }
18 . . . Lbrace: play.go:3:16
19 . . . Elts: []ast.Expr (len = 1) {
20 . . . . 0: *ast.CompositeLit {
21 . . . . . Type: nil
22 . . . . . Lbrace: play.go:3:18
23 . . . . . Elts: []ast.Expr (len = 1) {
24 . . . . . . 0: *ast.Ident {
25 . . . . . . . NamePos: play.go:3:19
26 . . . . . . . Name: "lhs"
27 . . . . . . . Obj: nil
28 . . . . . . }
29 . . . . . }
30 . . . . . Rbrace: play.go:3:23
31 . . . . . Incomplete: false
32 . . . . }
33 . . . }
34 . . . Rbrace: play.go:3:23
35 . . . Incomplete: false
36 . . }
37 . }
38 . Ellipsis: -
39 . Rparen: play.go:3:23
40 }

@adonovan
Copy link
Member Author

adonovan commented Aug 27, 2024

The issue seems to be that, although the outer CompositeLit has a type of Invalid recorded for it, the type checker is not descending into the inner literal and recording Invalid for it too.

This appears to be an even more minimal case, using valid syntax:

var _ = T{{ x }}

I've filed an issue against the type checker:

Independently, the other issue is that the parser swallows thousands of lines of text while recovering from a call. I've added a note to the existing issue #58833 (comment).

@adonovan
Copy link
Member Author

So, the gopls logic is actually correct; the bugs are in the parser and type-checker. The fix in https://go.dev/cl/606535 is a workaround, and an appropriate one for this particular issue, though I suspect there may be a great many places in the gopls logic that similarly assume every CompositeLit has a type and that could crash if invoked on ill-formed code. Let's proceed with 606535 and add workarounds for the others as they come up. The underlying issues are not new, so it appears to be rare.

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/612042 mentions this issue: gopls/internal/golang: Highlight: work around go/types bug

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/617475 mentions this issue: gopls/internal/test/marker: update regression test issue68918.txt

gopherbot pushed a commit to golang/tools that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2024
The fix for golang/go#69092 produces an extra error message in Go 1.24.
Ignore it.

Updates golang/go#68918.
Updates golang/go#69092.

Change-Id: I41ecff6fe916a04ed943e29ad10184d340ef84d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/617475
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
gopls Issues related to the Go language server, gopls. NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. Tools This label describes issues relating to any tools in the x/tools repository.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants