Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
runtime/pprof: make TestBlockMutexProfileInlineExpansion stricter
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
While working on CL 611241 and CL 616375, I introduced a bug that wasn't
caught by any test. CL 611241 added more inline expansion at sample time
for block/mutex profile stacks collected via frame pointer unwinding.
CL 616375 then changed how inline expansion for those stacks is done at
reporting time. So some frames passed through multiple rounds of inline
expansion, and this lead to duplicate stack frames in some cases. The
stacks from TestBlockMutexProfileInlineExpansion looked like

	sync.(*Mutex).Unlock
	runtime/pprof.inlineF
	runtime/pprof.inlineE
	runtime/pprof.inlineD
	runtime/pprof.inlineD
	runtime.goexit

after those two CLs, and in particular after CL 616375. Note the extra
inlineD frame. The test didn't catch that since it was only looking for
a few frames in the stacks rather than checking the entire stacks.

This CL makes that test stricter by checking the entire expected stacks
rather than just a portion of the stacks.

Change-Id: I0acc739d826586e9a63a081bb98ef512d72cdc9a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/617235
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
  • Loading branch information
nsrip-dd authored and prattmic committed Oct 2, 2024
1 parent 268eaf9 commit 5b0f859
Showing 1 changed file with 12 additions and 12 deletions.
24 changes: 12 additions & 12 deletions src/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2727,38 +2727,38 @@ func TestBlockMutexProfileInlineExpansion(t *testing.T) {
wg.Wait()

tcs := []struct {
Name string
Collect func([]runtime.BlockProfileRecord) (int, bool)
SubStack string
Name string
Collect func([]runtime.BlockProfileRecord) (int, bool)
Stack string
}{
{
Name: "mutex",
Collect: runtime.MutexProfile,
SubStack: `sync.(*Mutex).Unlock
Stack: `sync.(*Mutex).Unlock
runtime/pprof.inlineF
runtime/pprof.inlineE
runtime/pprof.inlineD`,
runtime/pprof.inlineD
runtime.goexit`,
},
{
Name: "block",
Collect: runtime.BlockProfile,
SubStack: `sync.(*Mutex).Lock
Stack: `sync.(*Mutex).Lock
runtime/pprof.inlineC
runtime/pprof.inlineB
runtime/pprof.inlineA`,
runtime/pprof.inlineA
runtime.goexit`,
},
}

for _, tc := range tcs {
t.Run(tc.Name, func(t *testing.T) {
stacks := getProfileStacks(tc.Collect, false)
for _, s := range stacks {
if strings.Contains(s, tc.SubStack) {
return
}
if slices.Contains(stacks, tc.Stack) {
return
}
t.Error("did not see expected stack")
t.Logf("wanted:\n%s", tc.SubStack)
t.Logf("wanted:\n%s", tc.Stack)
t.Logf("got: %s", stacks)
})
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 5b0f859

Please sign in to comment.