-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v3: Improve performance of helper functions #3086
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update enhances the codebase by refining workflows, improving performance, and clarifying naming conventions. Key changes include conditional logic for commenting on pull requests in GitHub Actions, a clearer target name in the Makefile for markdown formatting, and optimizations to functions and benchmarks in the Go code. These modifications collectively improve code efficiency, readability, and maintenance. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GitHubActions
participant Codebase
User->>GitHubActions: Create Pull Request
GitHubActions->>Codebase: Check if forked
alt Not a Fork
GitHubActions->>User: Allow comment on PR
else Forked
GitHubActions->>User: No comment allowed
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3086 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.62% 83.64% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 115 115
Lines 8332 8339 +7
==========================================
+ Hits 6968 6975 +7
Misses 1041 1041
Partials 323 323
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/benchmark.yml (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- helpers.go (5 hunks)
- helpers_test.go (11 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Makefile
Additional comments not posted (21)
.github/workflows/benchmark.yml (1)
68-69
: Conditional Commenting on PRsThe conditional expression for
comment-on-alert
ensures comments are only posted if the branch is not a fork. This is a good practice to avoid irrelevant comments on forked branches.helpers_test.go (11)
141-142
: Enhanced Benchmark AccuracyThe addition of
b.ReportAllocs()
andb.ResetTimer()
at the beginning of the benchmark function improves the accuracy of memory allocation reporting and timing.
210-211
: Enhanced Benchmark AccuracyThe addition of
b.ReportAllocs()
andb.ResetTimer()
at the beginning of the benchmark function improves the accuracy of memory allocation reporting and timing.
324-325
: Enhanced Benchmark AccuracyThe addition of
b.ReportAllocs()
andb.ResetTimer()
at the beginning of the benchmark function improves the accuracy of memory allocation reporting and timing.
368-369
: Enhanced Benchmark AccuracyThe addition of
b.ReportAllocs()
andb.ResetTimer()
at the beginning of the benchmark function improves the accuracy of memory allocation reporting and timing.
384-385
: Enhanced Benchmark AccuracyThe addition of
b.ReportAllocs()
andb.ResetTimer()
at the beginning of the benchmark function improves the accuracy of memory allocation reporting and timing.
467-468
: Enhanced Benchmark AccuracyThe addition of
b.ReportAllocs()
andb.ResetTimer()
at the beginning of the benchmark function improves the accuracy of memory allocation reporting and timing.
481-482
: Enhanced Benchmark AccuracyThe addition of
b.ReportAllocs()
andb.ResetTimer()
at the beginning of the benchmark function improves the accuracy of memory allocation reporting and timing.
544-545
: Enhanced Benchmark AccuracyThe addition of
b.ReportAllocs()
andb.ResetTimer()
at the beginning of the benchmark function improves the accuracy of memory allocation reporting and timing.
563-564
: Enhanced Benchmark AccuracyThe addition of
b.ReportAllocs()
andb.ResetTimer()
at the beginning of the benchmark function improves the accuracy of memory allocation reporting and timing.
574-575
: Enhanced Benchmark AccuracyThe addition of
b.ReportAllocs()
andb.ResetTimer()
at the beginning of the benchmark function improves the accuracy of memory allocation reporting and timing.
589-590
: Enhanced Benchmark AccuracyThe addition of
b.ReportAllocs()
andb.ResetTimer()
at the beginning of the benchmark function improves the accuracy of memory allocation reporting and timing.helpers.go (9)
301-301
: Improved Performance inparamsMatch
The use of
utils.EqualFold
directly on thespecParam
andkey
improves performance by avoiding unnecessary string conversions.
431-434
: Optimized Quality ParsingThe optimized parsing of the quality parameter (
q
) reduces the number of string conversions and improves efficiency.
439-441
: Efficient Header Parameter HandlingThe use of a pooled
headerParams
instance and clearing it before use improves memory efficiency.
443-450
: Optimized Parameter HandlingThe optimized handling of header parameters, including the direct comparison of the
q
parameter length and first byte, improves performance.
462-462
: Efficient Whitespace TrimmingThe use of
bytes.TrimSpace
for trimming whitespace is more efficient and appropriate for the intended use.
466-471
: Optimized Specificity DeterminationThe determination of specificity using byte comparisons instead of string comparisons enhances performance.
482-488
: Efficient Accepted Types HandlingThe creation and sorting of accepted types based on quality and specificity is efficient and maintains the original functionality.
498-506
: Simplified Return MechanismThe simplified return mechanism for the first matching offer improves control flow and readability.
514-514
: Efficient Return MechanismThe direct return of an empty string when no offers match is efficient and clear.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50
.
Benchmark suite | Current: 7bde210 | Previous: 8c3f81e | Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
Benchmark_Compress_Levels/Zstd_LevelDefault - B/op |
1 B/op |
0 B/op |
+∞ |
Benchmark_Compress_Levels/Zstd_LevelBestCompression - B/op |
1 B/op |
0 B/op |
+∞ |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
* Improve performance of helper functions * Fix issue with PR comments from forks
Description
getOffer
helper function.paramsMatch
helper function.GPT4o
.Changes introduced
Type of change