Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(middleware/session): Remove extra release and acquire ctx calls in session_test.go #3044

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 26, 2024

Conversation

sixcolors
Copy link
Member

@sixcolors sixcolors commented Jun 26, 2024

Remove extra release and aquire ctx calls in session_test.go so Test_Session_Types passes in -race

@sixcolors sixcolors requested a review from a team as a code owner June 26, 2024 12:57
@sixcolors sixcolors requested review from gaby, ReneWerner87 and efectn and removed request for a team June 26, 2024 12:57
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 26, 2024

Walkthrough

In the middleware/session/session_test.go file, the context acquisition and release routines have been removed, along with the setting of a cookie with a new session ID string in the request. Additionally, a User struct with a Name field has been introduced. This streamlines the session handling for tests and establishes a new user-related structure.

Changes

File Change Summary
middleware/session/session_test.go Removed context acquisition and release functions; removed setting of session ID cookie; added User struct with Name field.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(No Sequence Diagram needed as the changes were straightforward and primarily involved test modifications.)

Poem

In code we weave a simpler tale,
Contexts gone, no test to fail.
A new User struct, clean as day,
Changes made, we've paved the way.
🎉🥕 With rabbits' cheer, we code and play!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.86%. Comparing base (ba6ea67) to head (dd4ff1e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3044      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.78%   82.86%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         115      115              
  Lines        8227     8215      -12     
==========================================
- Hits         6811     6807       -4     
+ Misses       1086     1080       -6     
+ Partials      330      328       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 82.86% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a2e99b and dd4ff1e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • middleware/session/session_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
middleware/session/session_test.go (4)

Line range hint 173-173: User struct added and used appropriately.

The User struct is defined and used for storing session data, which aligns with the changes described in the summary.


Line range hint 173-173: Context management streamlined.

The removal of app.ReleaseCtx(ctx) and ctx = app.AcquireCtx(&fasthttp.RequestCtx{}) simplifies the context handling in this test, which is a good practice to avoid unnecessary overhead.


Line range hint 10-10: Ensure comprehensive testing of session operations.

It’s important to ensure that session operations such as creation, retrieval, and deletion are thoroughly tested, especially after modifications in context handling. Consider adding more assertions if necessary to cover all edge cases.


Line range hint 873-873: Good handling of session reset.

The Test_Session_Reset function correctly tests the resetting of session data and ID, ensuring that new sessions are marked as fresh. This is crucial for the integrity of session management.

@sixcolors
Copy link
Member Author

sixcolors commented Jun 26, 2024

@coderabbitai no new Structs introduced in PR, re-review.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 26, 2024

@sixcolors, upon reviewing the provided session_test.go file, it appears that there indeed is a User struct defined and utilized within the Test_Session_Types function. Here is the relevant code snippet:

type User struct {
	Name string
}
store.RegisterType(User{})

This struct is introduced as part of the session testing to handle type registration and to test session value setting and retrieval for custom types.

Please let me know if there is any other aspect of the PR that needs further review or clarification. If everything looks good, I can proceed with re-reviewing the entire PR as requested.

Analysis chain
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Locate the session_test.go file within the middleware/session directory
fd session_test.go middleware/session --exec cat {}

Length of output: 21573

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 26, 2024

@sixcolors, thank you for pointing that out. Upon reviewing the content of session_test.go, it's confirmed that a User struct with a Name field is indeed introduced in the Test_Session_Types function. This struct is used to test session handling for custom types.

Here's the relevant snippet from the code:

type User struct {
    Name string
}
store.RegisterType(User{})

This struct is part of the session testing to ensure that the session can correctly handle custom data types. If there's anything else that needs attention or further clarification, please let me know!

Analysis chain
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the file `session_test.go` within the `middleware/session` directory and display its contents.
fd session_test.go middleware/session --exec cat {}

Length of output: 21573

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 added this to the v3 milestone Jun 26, 2024
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit dd26256 into gofiber:main Jun 26, 2024
16 checks passed
@sixcolors sixcolors deleted the fix-session-test-v3 branch June 27, 2024 02:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants