Refactor Documenation for HealthCheck #2905
Conversation
sebytza23
requested review from
gaby,
sixcolors,
ReneWerner87 and
efectn
and removed request for
a team
WalkthroughThe Fiber framework has updated its Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 4
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- docs/api/middleware/healthcheck.md (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
docs/api/middleware/healthcheck.md (2)
- 26-26: The updated function signature
NewHealthCheckeris correctly documented. However, it would be beneficial to include a brief explanation or note about the change fromNewtoNewHealthCheckerfor clarity and to help developers understand the reason behind the change.Consider adding a note or a brief explanation about the change from
NewtoNewHealthCheckerto provide context and help developers transition smoothly.
- 40-65: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [43-71]
The examples provided demonstrate the new way to initialize the HealthCheck middleware using
NewHealthChecker. These examples are clear and cover various use cases, including default endpoints, custom endpoints, and extended configurations. However, it's important to ensure that these examples are tested and verified to work as expected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- docs/api/middleware/healthcheck.md (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
docs/api/middleware/healthcheck.md (5)
- 2-2: The documentation correctly updates the ID to uppercase, aligning with standard conventions.
- 26-26: The signature section has been updated to reflect the new
NewHealthCheckerfunction, which is crucial for developers to understand the new way to initialize the HealthCheck middleware.- 33-33: The import statement has been corrected to remove unnecessary space after the opening parenthesis, adhering to Go formatting standards.
- 40-65: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [43-71]
The examples section has been thoroughly updated to demonstrate the use of
NewHealthCheckerin various scenarios, including minimal configurations and custom probes. This comprehensive update is essential for developers to understand how to implement the HealthCheck middleware with the new initialization method.
- However, there's a minor inconsistency in the comment regarding the behavior of
app.Allandapp.Getmethods. It's mentioned that usingapp.Allwill result in a404 Not Foundfor non-GET methods, which might be slightly misleading sinceapp.Allis intended to handle all HTTP methods. It would be more accurate to clarify that the middleware itself is designed to respond to GET requests, and other methods would not trigger the health check logic.Consider clarifying the comment about the behavior of
app.Allandapp.Getto accurately reflect how the middleware responds to different HTTP methods.
- 1-5: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [78-100]
The documentation correctly updates the
Configstruct and thedefaultProbefunction, ensuring there's no unnecessary space before the closing parenthesis, which aligns with Go formatting standards.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 5
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- docs/api/middleware/healthcheck.md (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
docs/api/middleware/healthcheck.md (1)
- 26-26: The Signatures section accurately reflects the change to
NewHealthChecker, aligning with the PR's objectives. This update is crucial for developers to understand the new way to initialize the HealthCheck middleware.
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## Examples | ||
|
|
||
| Import the middleware package that is part of the [Fiber](https://github.com/gofiber/fiber) web framework | ||
| ```go | ||
| import ( | ||
| import( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the import statement example, ensure there is no unnecessary space after the opening parenthesis to follow Go formatting standards. This change aligns with the previous comment made on outdated commits, ensuring consistency and adherence to best practices.
- import(
+ import(Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| import( | |
| import( |
|
Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉 We here at Fiber are proud of you! If you need help or want to chat with us, join us on Discord https://gofiber.io/discord |
* Refactor Documenation for HealthCheck * Update docs/api/middleware/healthcheck.md --------- Co-authored-by: RW <rene@gofiber.io>
Description
This Pull Request fix the documentation for HealthCheck middleware.
Changes introduced
The method presented was changed.
Type of change
Checklist
/docs/directory for Fiber's documentation.Summary by CodeRabbit
healthcheckmiddleware documentation to reflect the new function signature for initialization in the Fiber framework.NewHealthCheckerto replace the previous functionNewin thehealthcheckmiddleware.