Fix mutex analyses refactoring indentation (PR #662)

Author: sim642

src/analyses/basePriv.ml

@@ -279,12 +279,12 @@ struct
     if Locksets.(not (Lockset.mem m (current_lockset ask))) then (
       let get_m = get_m_with_mutex_inits ask getg m in
       (* Really we want is_unprotected, but pthread_cond_wait emits unlock-lock events,
-        where our (necessary) original context still has the mutex,
-        so the query would be on the wrong lockset.
-        TODO: Fixing the event contexts is hard: https://github.com/goblint/analyzer/pull/487#discussion_r765905029.
-        Therefore, just use _without to exclude the mutex we shouldn't have.
-        In non-cond locks we don't have it anyway, so there's no difference.
-        No other privatization uses is_unprotected, so this hack is only needed here. *)
+         where our (necessary) original context still has the mutex,
+         so the query would be on the wrong lockset.
+         TODO: Fixing the event contexts is hard: https://github.com/goblint/analyzer/pull/487#discussion_r765905029.
+         Therefore, just use _without to exclude the mutex we shouldn't have.
+         In non-cond locks we don't have it anyway, so there's no difference.
+         No other privatization uses is_unprotected, so this hack is only needed here. *)
       let is_in_V x _ = is_protected_by ask m x && is_unprotected_without ask x m in
       let cpa' = CPA.filter is_in_V get_m in
       if M.tracing then M.tracel "priv" "PerMutexOplusPriv.lock m=%a cpa'=%a\n" LockDomain.Addr.pretty m CPA.pretty cpa';

src/analyses/mutexAnalysis.ml

@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ struct
 
     let remove_all ctx =
       (* Mutexes.iter (fun m ->
-          ctx.emit (MustUnlock m)
-        ) (D.export_locks ctx.local); *)
+           ctx.emit (MustUnlock m)
+         ) (D.export_locks ctx.local); *)
       (* TODO: used to have remove_nonspecial, which kept v.vname.[0] = '{' variables *)
       D.empty ()
   end