Skip to content

Conversation

@GiteaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Backport #27263 by @lunny

This PR will also keep the consistent between list assigned users and check assigned users.

…-gitea#27263)

This PR will also keep the consistent between list assigned users and
check assigned users.
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added type/bug type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality labels Feb 24, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.21.7 milestone Feb 24, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Feb 24, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot requested review from delvh and denyskon February 24, 2024 14:14
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Feb 24, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Feb 24, 2024
@yardenshoham yardenshoham added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Feb 24, 2024
@delvh delvh merged commit f98a1b8 into go-gitea:release/v1.21 Feb 24, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Feb 24, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 3, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants