Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add restricted user filter to LDAP authentication #10600

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 5, 2020

Conversation

lafriks
Copy link
Member

@lafriks lafriks commented Mar 4, 2020

Adds option to set restricted user filter to LDAP authentication and synchronization.

Extends feature #6274

@lafriks lafriks added the type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality label Mar 4, 2020
@lafriks lafriks added this to the 1.12.0 milestone Mar 4, 2020
@lafriks lafriks changed the title Add restricted user filter to LDAP authentification Add restricted user filter to LDAP authentication Mar 4, 2020
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Mar 4, 2020
@guillep2k
Copy link
Member

UT fails

@lafriks
Copy link
Member Author

lafriks commented Mar 4, 2020

@guillep2k should be fixed now

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Mar 4, 2020
@lafriks
Copy link
Member Author

lafriks commented Mar 5, 2020

Make lgtm work

@lafriks lafriks merged commit 37c3db7 into go-gitea:master Mar 5, 2020
@lafriks lafriks deleted the feat/ldap_restricted branch March 5, 2020 06:30
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants