New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

your indexed records for https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/169255331 #9

Open

baidakovil opened this issue Dec 3, 2023 · 1 comment

baidakovil commented Dec 3, 2023

Hi!

(I am author off the iNat obs with Interaction field, went to GloBi).

I was just looking at your GloBI indexed record at https://www.globalbioticinteractions.org/?interactionType=interactsWith&targetTaxon=Cetonia%20aurata and I was wondering about all that working!

Member

jhpoelen commented Dec 3, 2023

Hi @baidakovil -

Thanks for sharing your note and for annotating your iNat obs with interaction fields.

I was able to find your observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/169255331 via https://www.globalbioticinteractions.org/?interactionType=eatenBy&targetTaxon=Cetonia%20aurata (see attached screenshot).

I noticed that there's many interaction claims that involved Cetonia aurata , so instead of paging (by clicking on "more") through the results using a generic interaction type (i.e., "interactsWith"). https://www.globalbioticinteractions.org/?interactionType=interactsWith&targetTaxon=Cetonia%20aurata , I narrowed the interaction type to "eatenBy".

Please let me know if there's any unexpected results. . .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment