Agentic Workflow Audit Report - December 4, 2025 #5476
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 3 days ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
Analyzed 60 workflow runs from the last 24 hours. The repository's agentic workflows show excellent health with a 96.2% success rate and strong operational efficiency.
Key Highlights:
📈 Workflow Health Trends
Success/Failure Patterns
Analysis: The workflow health chart shows consistently strong performance over the past 15 days. Success rates have remained above 90%, with only occasional failures. The trend indicates stable and reliable workflow execution with no signs of systemic degradation.
Token Usage & Costs
Analysis: Token consumption shows expected variability based on workflow complexity. The 7-day moving average indicates stable resource utilization. Daily costs fluctuate between $2-$15 depending on the workflows scheduled, with the current 24-hour period at $8.65 representing moderate activity.
📊 Detailed Statistics
Period Analyzed
Last 24 Hours (December 3-4, 2025)
Workflow Execution Summary
Resource Consumption
Top Resource-Intensive Workflows
Highest Cost Runs
Go Logger Enhancement - $1.97 (§19893306675)
Semantic Function Refactoring - $1.15 (§19886794300)
Documentation Unbloat - $1.10 (§19910382281)
Copilot Agent Prompt Clustering Analysis - $0.90 (§19905552784)
Copilot Agent PR Analysis - $0.85 (§19903978892)
Failed Workflow Analysis
Failed Runs
The Daily Repository Chronicle (§19900283074)
Smoke Copilot (§19901167308)
Recommendation: Both failures occurred without any token usage, suggesting they failed during initialization or pre-execution validation. Review workflow logs to identify startup issues.
Missing Tools Report
Tool 1: GitHub Safe-Input Query Tools
Impact: Low - Affects only one workflow
Recommendation: Enable network access for safe-inputs or provide authenticated GitHub API access
Tool 2: Shell Command Execution
Impact: Low - Affects only code tidying workflow
Recommendation: Review and adjust file system permissions for go/make toolchain
MCP Server Status
✅ All MCP Servers Operating Normally
No MCP server failures detected in the last 24 hours. All configured MCP servers (GitHub, safeoutputs, playwright, etc.) are functioning correctly.
Successful Operations (Noops)
The following workflows completed successfully with no changes needed:
🔍 Recommendations
Priority Actions
1. Investigate Failed Workflows (Priority: High)
2. Address Missing Tool Access (Priority: Medium)
3. Review High-Cost Workflows (Priority: Low)
4. Monitor Success Rate Trends (Priority: Low)
Performance Observations
✅ Strengths:
📈 Historical Context
15-Day Trend Analysis
Based on historical audit data from November 22 to December 4:
Success Rate Trends
Cost Trends
Token Usage Patterns
Key Insights
Next Audit
This audit will run again tomorrow at 00:00 UTC. Check back for updated trends and any new issues.
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions