📚 Documentation Noob Test Report - 2026-01-23 #11470
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-01-30T07:44:56.042Z. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
Date of test: January 23, 2026
Test approach: Analyzed HTML and source markdown documentation as a complete beginner
Pages analyzed:
index.html)/setup/quick-start/)/setup/cli/)/setup/agentic-authoring/)/introduction/overview/)Overall impression as a new user: The documentation is comprehensive and well-structured, but contains several areas that could confuse newcomers, particularly around terminology, prerequisites, and the relationship between tools.
🔴 Critical Issues (Block getting started)
1. Confusing Tool Relationships: gh-aw vs GitHub Copilot
Location: Multiple pages (Quick Start, Agentic Authoring)
Issue: The documentation uses "GitHub Copilot," "Copilot CLI," "copilot" command, and references to
@github/copilot-clinpm package without clearly explaining these are different tools with different purposes.Why it's confusing:
gh awextension, then later says "use the copilot command"gh awandcopilotare the same thingRecommendation:
Add a clear callout box early in Quick Start:
3. "Daily" Schedule Is Mysterious
Location: Quick Start, workflow example
Issue: The configuration shows
schedule: dailybut doesn't explain:Why it's blocking:
Current text:
Better text:
🟡 Confusing Areas (Slow down learning)
1. Jargon Without Definitions (First Encounter)
Location: Quick Start, early paragraphs
Terms that appear without explanation:
.lock.ymlconcept is critical but not explained upfrontRecommendation:
Add a "Key Concepts" callout box at the top of Quick Start with 2-3 sentence definitions of the most critical terms:
5. What Happens After "gh aw run"?
Location: Quick Start, Step 5
Issue: After running
gh aw run daily-team-status, the user is told to "check the status" but not:Recommendation:
Add expected timing and troubleshooting:
6. Codespace Warning Comes Too Late
Location: Quick Start, Step 1 tip box
Issue: The Codespace installation workaround appears AFTER the standard installation command. Users in Codespaces will try the standard method, wait for it to fail, then see the workaround.
Recommendation:
Add detection hint before the standard installation:
🟢 What Worked Well
1. Progressive Disclosure of Complexity
The Quick Start doesn't try to explain everything at once. It gets you to a working workflow, then links to deeper docs. Good balance.
2. Concrete Examples
The daily team status workflow is a perfect "Hello World" - practical, understandable, and immediately useful.
3. Verification Steps
Including
gh aw statusoutput and explaining what to expect is excellent. More workflows should follow this pattern.4. Visual Workflow Diagram
The simple ASCII diagram showing
.md→ compile →.lock.yml→ GitHub Actions is clear and helpful.5. Security Warnings
The warning at the top about AI agents making decisions is appropriate and well-placed.
6. Link Density
Appropriate use of links to glossary terms and deeper docs. Not overwhelming, but enough to dig deeper.
📝 Recommendations Summary
Quick Wins (High Impact, Low Effort)
Medium Priority
gh aw initexplanation with file listLonger-Term Improvements
🎯 Success Metrics
This documentation noob test identified:
The documentation is structurally sound but needs clarity improvements for complete beginners, particularly around:
Priority: Focus on the "Quick Wins" section first - these are simple text changes that will have immediate impact on new user success rates.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions