Skip to content

add missing documentation of use cases for workflowrun states #34987

Closed

Description

@tomsit-ionos

Code of Conduct

What article on docs.github.com is affected?

https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/workflow-runs?apiVersion=2022-11-28#list-workflow-runs-for-a-repository

but should be linked/included on all other pages that are concerned with the WF run status

What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?

most of the statuses are self explanatory but there is a gray area.

  1. Plz provide a description/use case/trigger for each of the statuses, preferably with a state diagram.
    In particular i would like to know:

    the meaning of these: neutral, stale
    the difference/relation of these: queued, requested, waiting, pending, action_required

  2. Delineate which value belongs to which property as per the above doc:
    image

Additional information

PS: this is a rehash from here: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/70540#discussioncomment-10978598

No response

Activity

  1. added
    contentThis issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team
    on Oct 18, 2024
  2. added
    triageDo not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team
    on Oct 18, 2024
  3. tomsit-ionos commented on Oct 18, 2024

    @tomsit-ionos
    Author

    btw: i just found this case: "conclusion": "startup_failure"

  4. added
    actionsThis issue or pull request should be reviewed by the docs actions team
    waiting for reviewIssue/PR is waiting for a writer's review
    and removed
    triageDo not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team
    on Oct 18, 2024
  5. nguyenalex836 commented on Oct 18, 2024

    @nguyenalex836
    Contributor

    @tomsit-ionos Thank you for raising this issue! I'll get this triaged for review ✨ Our team will provide feedback regarding the best next steps for this issue - thanks for your patience! 💛

  6. added
    needs SMEThis proposal needs review from a subject matter expert
    on Oct 18, 2024
  7. github-actions commented on Oct 18, 2024

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    Thanks for opening an issue! We've triaged this issue for technical review by a subject matter expert 👀

  8. tomsit-ionos commented on Oct 18, 2024

    @tomsit-ionos
    Author

    also it is not quite obvious why the workflow can transition like so:

    queued -> in_progress -> queued -> completed

  9. xxx2585 commented on Nov 11, 2024

    @xxx2585
  10. nguyenalex836 commented on Dec 4, 2024

    @nguyenalex836
    Contributor

    @tomsit-ionos Thank you for your patience while our SME team reviewed! Our SME team agrees it would be valuable to have documentation covering these statuses and conclusions.

    In terms of ideal location for this new content, we would prefer creating a new reference type of article to Managing workflow runs that defines these, and then link to that article from the API docs.

    I've added the help wanted label so that you, or anyone else with knowledge of this area, may work on adding this new content 💛

  11. added
    SME reviewedAn SME has reviewed this issue/PR
    and removed
    waiting for reviewIssue/PR is waiting for a writer's review
    needs SMEThis proposal needs review from a subject matter expert
    on Dec 4, 2024
  12. 3 remaining items

  13. added
    staleThere is no recent activity on this issue or pull request
    on May 5, 2025
  14. removed
    staleThere is no recent activity on this issue or pull request
    on May 13, 2025
  15. added
    triageDo not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team
    on May 13, 2025
  16. removed
    triageDo not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team
    on May 13, 2025
  17. luismanac commented on May 29, 2025

    @luismanac

    want to work on it

  18. 55-x commented on Jun 3, 2025

    @55-x

    Is this still being worked on?

  19. cceneag commented on Jun 3, 2025

    @cceneag
  20. ayushmank commented on Nov 21, 2025

    @ayushmank

    hi @tomsit-ionos is this issue still opens
    please let me know
    i would like to contribute in this

  21. tomsit-ionos commented on Nov 21, 2025

    @tomsit-ionos
    Author

    Yes this seems to be still open - at least looking at the API that I referenced in the description , still doesn't have an easily accessible link or description to the meaning of the states and their transitions

  22. ayushmank commented on Nov 21, 2025

    @ayushmank

    Hi @tomsit-ionos please have a look to this pr [#41379 ] when you have free time
    thanks !!

  23. removed
    help wantedAnyone is welcome to open a pull request to fix this issue
    on Aug 17, 2026
  24. subatoi commented on Aug 17, 2026

    @subatoi
    Contributor

    Hi @tomsit-ionos—

    I apologise for the late conclusion here. In fact, this page has existed since early last year: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/reference/status-checks. That to say, you raising an issue here in October of 2024 was entirely valid, and I regret that you weren't informed sooner.

    I do see the potential value in adding a link to the REST API docs that you referenced; however, we wouldn't be able to accept a contribution to do that in this repo. I will, instead, pass that feedback on to the relevant team, but since I can't guarantee a timeframe for a response from them and the main part of this issue's problem is resolved, I'm going to go ahead and close this out.

    Apologies again for the delay, and thank you very much for your contribution and interest in the GitHub docs 🙇

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    SME reviewedAn SME has reviewed this issue/PRactionsThis issue or pull request should be reviewed by the docs actions teamcontentThis issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions