@@ -29,9 +29,180 @@ This edition covers what happened during the months of November and December 202
2929### Support
3030-->
3131
32- <!-- -
33- ## Developer Spotlight:
34- -->
32+ ## Developer Spotlight: Lucas Seiki Oshiro
33+
34+ * ** Who are you and what do you do?**
35+
36+ My name is Lucas Oshiro, I'm [ one of the three] ( https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/programs/2025/projects/fGgMYHwl )
37+ GSoC '25 participants working on Git. I'm from São Paulo, Brazil
38+ and I'm a bachelor and master in Computer Science from the
39+ [ University of São Paulo] ( https://www5.usp.br/#english ) . I don't
40+ have only one specific interest in programming topics, I enjoy
41+ several different topics, like: lower-lever C code (like we do for Git),
42+ FP languages (especially Haskell), play with network simulators, data
43+ analysis, operating systems, databases and so on.
44+
45+ * ** How did you initially become interested in contributing to Git,
46+ and what motivated you to choose it as your GSoC project?**
47+
48+ Well, it's a long story... I think that it dates back to 2017, in a
49+ Computer Networks assignment at my university. My partner in that
50+ assignment was [ Matheus Tavares] ( https://matheustavares.gitlab.io/posts/gsoc-final-report ) ,
51+ who participated in [ GSoC '19 on Git] ( https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/archive/2019/projects/4787791739748352 ) .
52+ At the time, we needed to study a vulnerability and how it was fixed.
53+ We chose [ CVE-2017 -1000117] ( https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2017-1000117 ) ,
54+ which was vulnerability in Git. That was my first time reading Git
55+ source code.
56+
57+ Two years later, I was a member of [ group focused on contributing to Free/Open-Source software] ( https://flusp.ime.usp.br )
58+ at my University. I sent a patch to Git at the time, but I needed to
59+ focus on other stuff and I couldn't finish it.
60+
61+ After that, I started to work as a back-end software engineer and I
62+ witnessed several Git-related problems. My two previous experiences with
63+ Git's source code made me want to understand what was happening and
64+ delving into its internals, so I could help other developers from my
65+ company when something unexpected happened with Git.
66+
67+ This way, Git always felt like the right choice.
68+
69+ * ** How do you feel your contribution has impacted the Git community
70+ or the broader open source ecosystem?**
71+
72+ My GSoC project was to create the new command [ ` git repo info ` ] ( https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/archive/2025/projects/fGgMYHwl ) ).
73+ It was released in Git 2.52.0 and, like many other new Git features, I
74+ expect it will take some time to be widely adopted, since it's only
75+ available in bleeding-edge repositories. But I expect that it will be
76+ useful for forges, CIs, local tools, scripts, and other tools that
77+ depend on Git.
78+
79+ * ** Is there any aspect of Git that you now see differently after
80+ having contributed to it?**
81+
82+ I can't think of anything that I see differently after GSoC, but my
83+ previous contacts with Git's source code made me realize the importance
84+ of having a good commit history with good commit messages. It also made
85+ me understand how powerful Git is as a debugging and searching tool.
86+
87+ * ** How do you balance your contributions with other responsibilities
88+ like work or school?**
89+
90+ This year, I was more focused on finishing my master's research and I
91+ didn't have too many conflicts with GSoC, so I could focus on my
92+ master's when my patches were under review. However, I must admit that
93+ one of the reasons that I didn't apply to GSoC before was that, here
94+ in Brazil, we typically have final exams in June, which makes it hard
95+ to balance them with something else.
96+
97+ * ** Can you share how GSoC helped enhance your technical and
98+ non-technical skills (like communication, project management,
99+ etc.)?
100+
101+ I see Git as a product created by developers, for developers, and I
102+ think that here we sometimes need to do the work that in other contexts
103+ would be done by product owners and designers. I felt that especially
104+ during code reviews, which were often more focused on product and design
105+ decisions rather than the code itself. I had to learn how to discuss
106+ these kinds of decisions, always aiming to do what is best for Git
107+ and its users.
108+
109+ * ** What was the biggest challenge you faced during your contributions
110+ to Git, and how did you overcome it?**
111+
112+ I think that the biggest challenge was the complete redesigns of
113+ ` git repo info ` during the GSoC period, which made me re-write it from
114+ scratch several times. I think this was a consequence of my previous
115+ answer and that this challenge was solved itself.
116+
117+ * ** Have you thought about mentoring new GSoC / Outreachy students?**
118+
119+ Yes, it would be very nice!
120+
121+ * ** If you could get a team of expert developers to work full time on
122+ something in Git for a full year, what would it be?**
123+
124+ Git is amazing and I think we all agree that it makes the programmers'
125+ lives easier. It would be great if we had a GUI wrapping Git but
126+ targeting non-technical users.
127+
128+ * ** If you could remove something from Git without worrying about
129+ backwards compatibility, what would it be?**
130+
131+ Perhaps commands that accumulate responsibilities, like ` git checkout ` ,
132+ ` git reset ` and ` git rev-parse ` . They make sense from the Git
133+ perspective, but I think they are confusing from the users
134+ perspective.
135+
136+ * ** What upcoming features or changes in Git are you particularly
137+ excited about?**
138+
139+ Some that come to my mind are:
140+
141+ - Patrick Steinhardt's new [ ` git history ` ] ( https://lore.kernel.org/git/20250819-b4-pks-history-builtin-v1-0-9b77c32688fe@pks.im/ )
142+ command: rewriting history is essential to keep the repository sane
143+ and useful as a data storage, if done correctly. Currently we do that
144+ through interactive rebase but I think it can be intimidating for less
145+ experienced users. Jujutsu proposes a more straightforward way to do
146+ that and it's nice to see Patrick bringing it to Git.
147+
148+ - Justin Tobler's [ new ` git repo structure ` command] ( https://public-inbox.org/git/20251217175404.37963-1-jltobler@gmail.com/ ) :
149+ of course I'm interested in this subcommand since it is the sibling of
150+ my GSoC project. But it's not only because of that: a Git repository is
151+ a very rich source of information and ` git repo structure ` will be a
152+ powerful tool to retrieve it.
153+
154+ - Julia Evans's [ contributions to documentation] ( https://public-inbox.org/git/?q=f%3A%22Julia+Evans%22&r= ) :
155+ Julia has been producing high-quality content about several programming
156+ topics for years. I'm happy to see Git being documented by someone so
157+ committed to spreading knowledge and who knows how to explain advanced
158+ concepts using a simple language.
159+
160+ * ** What is your favorite Git-related tool/library, outside of Git
161+ itself?**
162+
163+ I use [ delta] ( https://github.com/dandavison/delta ) a lot, I like the way
164+ it highlights diffs. Other tools that I find interesting are [ Jujutsu] ( https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/ )
165+ and [ Magit] ( https://magit.vc/ ) , but I don't use them too much.
166+
167+ * ** What is your toolbox for interacting with the mailing list and for
168+ development of Git?**
169+
170+ I like desktop mail clients, but I don't have a strong preference. On
171+ Linux, I use Thunderbird. On Mac, I use Apple Mail. I also have some
172+ GMail filters for classifying the messages (patches, What's Cooking and
173+ Rev News announcements).
174+
175+ However, those mail clients don't have code syntax highlighting and it's
176+ hard to read the patches inside them. For that purpose, I use
177+ [ patch-hub] ( https://github.com/kworkflow/patch-hub ) , a TUI for reviewing
178+ patches from kernel mailing lists (including Git).
179+
180+ * ** How do you envision your own involvement with Git or other open
181+ source projects in the future?**
182+
183+ There are some things I want to finish in ` git repo info ` and I
184+ still send patches for it. I enjoyed contributing to Git and I
185+ don't want to stop here.
186+
187+ Outside Git development, I'll give an advanced course on Git next
188+ month. It will be a great opportunity to share what I've learned here
189+ with other people.
190+
191+ * ** What is your advice for people who want to start Git development?
192+ Where and how should they start?**
193+
194+ Read the [ Git Internals chapter from Pro Git] ( https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Internals-Plumbing-and-Porcelain ) ,
195+ follow everything described in [ Hacking Git] ( https://git.github.io/Hacking-Git/ ) ,
196+ and work on a [ microproject] ( https://git.github.io/SoC-2025-Microprojects/ ) .
197+
198+ * ** Would you recommend other students or contributors to participate
199+ in the GSoC, Outreachy or other mentoring programs, working on Git?
200+ Why? Do you have advice for them?**
201+
202+ Yes. I mean, I've already recommended some people from my university to
203+ apply to GSoC or Outreachy on Git and gave some tips to them. Some of
204+ them have already sent patches that were accepted.
205+
35206
36207## Other News
37208
0 commit comments