Turn git survey into a deprecated shim over git repo structure#6268
Conversation
d14deae to
46e1492
Compare
derrickstolee
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for making progress here. It looks like an interested contributor could take this version at tip and start a patch series to extend git repo structure to get this kind of data upstream.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR deprecates the experimental git survey command by turning it into a compatibility shim that translates legacy flags into the corresponding git repo structure options and then re-execs git repo structure. To close remaining feature gaps, it also extends git repo structure with annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping via --ref-filter, top-N per-path reporting via --top, and a new repo.structure.top configuration default.
Changes:
- Replace
git survey’s implementation with a deprecated re-exec shim togit repo structure, translating legacy flags (--top, ref-selection flags, progress). - Extend
git repo structureoutput and option surface: annotated-tag counts,--ref-filter(repeatable),--top=<n>(withrepo.structure.topdefault), plus corresponding tests. - Update documentation for the new
git repo structureoptions and introducerepo.structure.*config docs.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 8 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated 10 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
builtin/survey.c |
Removes the old survey implementation and replaces it with a deprecated shim that translates options and execs git repo structure. |
builtin/repo.c |
Adds annotated tag counting, --ref-filter, --top, top-path reporting in outputs, and repo.structure.top config handling. |
t/t8100-git-survey.sh |
Updates tests to validate deprecation banner/warning and forwarding behavior from git survey to git repo structure. |
t/t1901-repo-structure.sh |
Expands tests for annotated tags, --ref-filter, --top, and repo.structure.top behavior. |
Documentation/git-survey.adoc |
Marks git survey as deprecated and points users toward git repo structure. |
Documentation/git-repo.adoc |
Documents new git repo structure options (--ref-filter, --top) and updates synopsis. |
Documentation/config/repo.adoc |
Adds documentation for repo.structure.top. |
Documentation/config.adoc |
Includes the new config/repo.adoc documentation file. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Mirror what git survey already reports: lightweight tags (pointing straight at a commit/tree/blob) and annotated tags (pointing at an OBJ_TAG that is itself stored as a separate object) are different things in many monorepo contexts, and one of the differences git survey users routinely care about. Add an annotated_tags counter to struct ref_stats, populate it in count_references() by peeking at the ref OID's object type, and expose it as a sub-row under Tags in the table output and as references.tags.annotated.count in the machine-readable formats. Step toward pivoting the standalone git survey command onto git repo structure; this fills the first of the four feature gaps documented in the assessment. Tests in t1901 widened to assert the new row and key. Assisted-by: Opus 4.7 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
`git repo structure` walks every reference enumerated by `refs_for_each_ref()` and feeds each reference's tip into the path walk that produces the object counts. There is no way to scope the inquiry to a subset of refs, even though that is the most common need when an operator is investigating what part of the history is driving cost: only branches, only release tags, only one remote's view, etc. Add a single `--ref-filter=<pattern>` option that, when given, restricts both the reference count and the object walk to refs whose full name matches one of the patterns. The option is repeatable; multiple patterns form a union, so `--ref-filter='refs/heads/*' --ref-filter='refs/tags/v*'` includes local branches and tags whose short name starts with `v`. Patterns use `wildmatch()` with `WM_PATHNAME` semantics so a `*` does not cross `/`, matching the convention used by `git for-each-ref` positional arguments. Choosing a single flexible filter, rather than a proliferation of per-kind flags like `--branches`, `--tags`, `--remotes`, keeps the option surface small and lets the same mechanism express narrow selections the per-kind flags could not, such as "only release tags" (`'refs/tags/v*'`) or "only one remote's branches" (`'refs/remotes/origin/*'`). Without `--ref-filter`, behaviour is unchanged: every ref `refs_for_each_ref()` enumerates contributes. Both the reference counter and the path-walk seeding (via `add_pending_oid()`) sit on the same callback, so an early return when no pattern matches naturally excludes a ref from both. No separate object-walk machinery is needed. Cover the two interesting code paths with tests in t1901: a single filter narrowing to branches, and two filters unioning to include both branches and tags. Assisted-by: Opus 4.7 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
`git survey` distinguishes itself from `git repo structure` largely by its path-level reporting: in addition to whole-repo totals it lists the paths whose object histories dominate the repository, ranked by raw count, on-disk size, and inflated size, separately for trees and blobs. That is often the most actionable output from `git survey`, since it points an operator at the directories and files that should be reviewed for cleanup, sparse-checkout exclusion, or rewriting. `git repo structure` already drives the same path-walk traversal that `git survey` uses to gather its per-path numbers; the callback simply discards the path. Aggregate per-(path, type) summaries inside that existing callback and add a bounded, descending-sorted "top-N" table keyed by each of the three axes. Gate the feature behind a new `--top=<n>` option, defaulting to 0, so unadorned invocations are unaffected and pay no extra work for the top-N tracking. Mirror the sort and eviction strategy from `builtin/survey.c`: keep an array of at most N entries sorted from largest to smallest, walk it from the bottom on each candidate, and shift entries down when a new one belongs. Compared to `builtin/survey.c`, drop the void-pointer indirection in the table data, type the comparator's arguments, and fold the trivial comparators into the `(a > b) - (a < b)` idiom. For the human-readable `table` output, extend the existing nested bullet layout with two new top-level sections, `* Top trees` and `* Top blobs`, each containing three sub-tables (`Top by count`, `Top by disk size`, `Top by inflated size`). The path becomes the row name and the relevant scalar becomes the value, reusing `stats_table_count_addf` and `stats_table_size_addf` so units and column alignment match the rest of the table. For the `lines`/`nul` key-value formats, emit one `objects.<type>.top.by_<axis>.<rank>.path=<path>` entry alongside an `objects.<type>.top.by_<axis>.<rank>.<axis>=<value>` entry per ranked path, so consumers can dispatch by axis without parsing the schema. The root tree's path is the empty string as produced by the path-walk machinery; preserve that as-is to stay faithful to the upstream representation rather than fabricating a placeholder. This is the first piece of folding `git survey`'s functionality into `git repo structure`. Subsequent commits will add the corresponding configuration knob and, eventually, turn `git survey` into a thin deprecated shim over `git repo structure`. Assisted-by: Opus 4.7 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The preceding commit added `--top=<n>` to `git repo structure`,
reporting the top-N paths per type ranked by count, on-disk size, and
inflated size. Cover the three behaviors that matter for that option:
* Without `--top`, the key-value output emits no `top.*` keys, so
existing parsers stay unaffected.
* `--top=N` produces exactly N ranked entries on each of the six
`objects.<type>.top.by_<axis>` axes (count/disk_size/inflated_size
crossed with trees/blobs), and a constructed input where one blob
is several orders of magnitude bigger than the other lets us
assert the ordering on the disk-size and inflated-size axes.
* A negative `--top` is rejected with a non-zero exit and a message
naming the constraint, so a typo cannot silently degrade into the
default zero.
Avoid grep patterns starting with `--`; grep would parse the leading
double dash as an option terminator.
Assisted-by: Opus 4.7
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
`git survey` exposes its `--top` default via `survey.top` so that a site or per-repository operator can switch the detail tables on once and have every subsequent invocation include them. Mirror that ergonomics for `git repo structure` so that, as `git survey`'s functionality is folded into `git repo structure`, the configuration side of the migration story stays equivalent. Add a small `git_config_int` callback bound to `repo.structure.top` and invoke it before `parse_options()`, so a `--top=<N>` on the command line cleanly overrides the configured default (including `--top=0` to opt out of the detail tables when configuration enables them). Reject negative configured values with the same wording as the command-line guard, since `git_config_int()` happily returns negative integers. Document the new variable in a fresh `Documentation/config/repo.adoc` and wire it into the alphabetical includes in `Documentation/config.adoc` between `repack.adoc` and `rerere.adoc`. Cover the precedence behaviour with a t1901 test: a configured value enables the tables by default, and a command-line `--top=0` suppresses them again. Note that the reported paths respect the `core.quotePath` setting. Assisted-by: Opus 4.7 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
`git survey` started life as an experimental scale-measurement tool; the preceding commits give `git repo structure` the path-level detail tables and ref-scoping mechanism that were `git survey`'s main draw, so the two now overlap substantially. Plan the migration explicitly: add a short notice at the top of the description making clear which of `git survey`'s knobs map to which `git repo structure` option, and state that a future release will turn `git survey` into a thin shim over `git repo structure`. Putting the notice in the description (rather than only the synopsis) ensures it shows up in `git help survey` rendering before the reader sees any option specifics, so an operator skimming the page learns about the replacement before adopting any survey-specific flags. Assisted-by: Opus 4.7 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
`git survey` was an experimental scale-measurement tool whose
distinctive features (ref-kind filters, top-N path tables) are now
all available in `git repo structure`. With the path-level reporting
in place (commits "repo: filter the structure scope via
--ref-filter=<pattern>" and "repo: report top-N paths by count, disk,
and inflated size in structure"), there is no functionality `git
survey` provides that `git repo structure` cannot.
Replace the 764-line `git survey` implementation with a roughly
hundred-line shim that:
* Accepts the existing `git survey` command line so callers in
scripts continue to parse without changes.
* Emits a deprecation warning naming the replacement command, so
interactive users learn about the migration target.
* Translates the survey-specific knobs into the equivalent
`git repo structure` invocation and re-execs the canonical
command via `execv_git_cmd()`. Per-kind ref selectors fan out
into the corresponding `refs/heads/*`, `refs/tags/*`, etc.
`--ref-filter` patterns; `--top=<N>` is forwarded directly;
`--all-refs` becomes the absence of any `--ref-filter`.
Two survey options have no `git repo structure` counterpart:
`--verbose` controlled per-step trace output the new command does
not emit, and `--detached` selected the detached HEAD which
`git repo structure` does not enumerate separately. Both are
silently accepted and produce a single warning each, so old
invocations keep working while the absence of these knobs in `git
repo structure` is made visible.
Rewrite t8100 to assert the shim's contract: the deprecation
warning is printed, the output is byte-identical to a corresponding
`git repo structure` invocation, and the per-kind selector
translation produces the right `--ref-filter` pattern. The
preceding survey-specific output assertions (the multi-column
plaintext tables) no longer apply, since `git repo structure`'s
output format is now the canonical one and is covered by t1901.
The `survey.*` configuration keys (`survey.top`, `survey.progress`,
`survey.verbose`) are no longer honored by the shim. They were
mirrored by the preceding `repo.structure.top` work for the most
useful knob; users with `survey.top` set in config should migrate
to `repo.structure.top`. This is a backward-incompatible removal
documented by the deprecation notice in `git-survey.adoc`.
Assisted-by: Opus 4.7
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
46e1492 to
87d1212
Compare
|
/add relnote feature The experimental The workflow run was started |
The experimental `git survey` command (which was never upstreamed to the core Git project) was deprecated and [converted into a small shim on top of `git repo structure`](git-for-windows/git#6268). In the future, `git repo structure` should be used instead, as the `git survey` command will be retired eventually. Signed-off-by: gitforwindowshelper[bot] <gitforwindowshelper-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
…6268) `git survey` was always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental. In the meantime, the `git repo structure` command was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turns `git survey` into a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalent `git repo structure` invocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two. The intent is that scripts pinned to `git survey` keep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". The `survey.*` configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered, `survey.top`, has a direct replacement in `repo.structure.top`.
git surveywas always experimental, and I never got around to upstreaming it to make it non-experimental.In the meantime, the
git repo structurecommand was upstreamed upstream, which covers most of the same ground with a cleaner option surface and a stable output contract. This PR closes the remaining gap (annotated-tag breakdown, ref scoping, top-N paths by count/disk/inflated, and the corresponding configuration knob) and then turnsgit surveyinto a thin shim that warns about deprecation, translates its old command line into the equivalentgit repo structureinvocation, and re-execs the canonical command. Net result: one user-facing tool to maintain and to teach instead of two.The intent is that scripts pinned to
git surveykeep working (a warning aside), and that operators have a single answer when they ask "how do I see what's making my repository large?". Thesurvey.*configuration keys are intentionally dropped; the only one that mattered,survey.top, has a direct replacement inrepo.structure.top.