Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Thank you for your report. I think the maximum number of the connection should be WORKER_COUNT ... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
I'm experiencing a problem at the moment where Redash seems to make it possible to open the maximum number of connections to my database as possible. The database is an AWS RDS database (I think it's a t3 small) but often times I catch around 60+ database connections which bricks my website since it literally prevents anything else from trying to connect or query data due to the massive queue.
Redash connects raw to this database and we do make a lot of use of query results in some dashboards for analytics but it's becoming a problem by blocking our admin frontend and storefront. We cannot afford to upgrade the database again and using alternatives like read replicas generally become too costly for it to be worth it. I see there is a WORKER_COUNT parameter/variable that I can set but I am not sure if that will help in this situation.
I do not want to completely slow Redash down but it is not the priority and should not be able to kill production like it currently is.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions