-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Empty optimalClusterSolution.txt #69
Comments
I'm running into the same issue. At a ploidy of 2 or 4, every solution (1-5 clusters) has S_Dbw (LogRatio) values of NaN, although there are (AllelicRatio) values. At a ploidy of 3, the S_Dbw validity index (LogRatio) is quite high (~3) for most solutions, but for the 5-cluster solution it's 0.0 - I'm wondering if I should go ahead with this solution, or if this is indicative of larger issues with the sample itself. All of the solutions don't seem to indicate any CNVs (all segments are copy number 2 in the ploidy 2 solutions, and copy number 4 in the ploidy 3 and 4 solutions), so I'm wondering if there's a chance that the purity is 0 and that's why I'm having issues (I wouldn't expect that based on the sample, but I've also observed odd results in matched RNA-seq data). |
You're right that it is possible that TITAN is estimating zero tumor purity and that would potentially lead to NaN values. Hopefully, the optimal solution is the one that has nearly 0 purity. If not, then you would need to select this manually. I had recently run into this issue myself where many of my samples had near 0 purity and I adjusted the solution selection to account for this. Sorry for the inconvenience if it is not working as expected for you. Best, |
Hi @gavinha, Thank you for the response! I do have another sample that I expected to have very low purity and it's being called as 0.3%, so in that case it's working as it should I think. It's also working well for the other 22 samples I have, so thank you for creating this helpful tool. Regarding the problematic sample, I do have three other samples from the same tumour and the best solutions for these all have ploidy 3. All of the solutions for the problematic sample under ploidy 3 have non-NaN values, so I think one of these may be the best solution. However, is it normal to see a validity index of 0.0, or would you recommend I choose from the ones that have an index > 0? I know this is a lot of information so I'm happy to include figures/parameter tables if that helps. Best, |
Hi @gavinha, |
Hi.
I have a question about TitanCNA result.
I got results of 11 WGS data using snakemake.
But, in only 1 sample, optimalClusterSolution.txt was empty.
Only column names are there.
Also, I found out NaN values in tumor_sample_1_cluster1.params.txt file.
Could I get some advice on this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: