[CI] Update performance benchmark: upgrade trt-llm to r24.07, and add SGLang (vllm-project#7412)

Signed-off-by: Amit Garg <mitgarg17495@gmail.com>

Author: KuntaiDu

.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/nightly-annotation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+
+## Description
+
+This file contains the downloading link for benchmarking results.
+
+- [benchmarking pipeline](artifact://nightly-pipeline.yaml)
+- [benchmarking results](artifact://results.zip)
+- [benchmarking code](artifact://nightly-benchmarks.zip)
+
+Please download the visualization scripts in the post
+
+
+## Results reproduction
+
+- Find the docker we use in `benchmarking pipeline`
+- Deploy the docker, and inside the docker:
+  - Download `nightly-benchmarks.zip`. 
+  - In the same folder, run the following code
+```
+export HF_TOKEN=<your HF token>
+apt update
+apt install -y git
+unzip nightly-benchmarks.zip
+VLLM_SOURCE_CODE_LOC=./ bash .buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/scripts/run-nightly-benchmarks.sh
+```
+
+And the results will be inside `./benchmarks/results`.
+

.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/nightly-descriptions.md

@@ -1,45 +1,39 @@
 
 # Nightly benchmark
 
-The main goal of this benchmarking is two-fold:
-- Performance clarity: Provide clarity on which one (vllm, tensorrt-llm, lmdeploy and tgi) leads in performance in what workload.
-- Reproducible: one can run the exact same set of benchmarking commands inside the exact same docker by following reproducing instructions in [reproduce.md]().
-
-
-## Docker images
-
-We benchmark vllm, tensorrt-llm, lmdeploy and tgi using the following docker images:
-- vllm/vllm-openai:v0.5.0.post1
-- nvcr.io/nvidia/tritonserver:24.04-trtllm-python-py3
-- openmmlab/lmdeploy:v0.5.0
-- ghcr.io/huggingface/text-generation-inference:2.1
-
-<!-- Please check <a href="artifact://workspace/build/buildkite/vllm/performance-benchmark/.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/nightly-pipeline.yaml">nightly-pipeline.yaml</a> artifact for more details on how we deploy the docker images. -->
-
-
-## Hardware
-
-One AWS node with 8x NVIDIA A100 GPUs.
-
-
-## Workload description
-
-We benchmark vllm, tensorrt-llm, lmdeploy and tgi using the following workload:
-
-- Input length: randomly sample 500 prompts from ShareGPT dataset (with fixed random seed).
-- Output length: the corresponding output length of these 500 prompts.
-- Models: llama-3 8B, llama-3 70B, mixtral 8x7B.
-- Average QPS (query per second): 4 for the small model (llama-3 8B) and 2 for other two models. For each QPS, the arrival time of each query is determined using a random Poisson process (with fixed random seed).
-- Evaluation metrics: Throughput (higher the better), TTFT (time to the first token, lower the better), ITL (inter-token latency, lower the better).
-
-<!-- Check <a href="artifact://workspace/build/buildkite/vllm/performance-benchmark/.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/tests/nightly-tests.json">nightly-tests.json</a> artifact for more details. -->
-
-## Plots
-
-In the following plots, the dot shows the mean and the error bar shows the standard error of the mean. Value 0 means that the corresponding benchmark crashed.
-
-<img src="artifact://nightly_results.png" alt="Benchmarking results" height=250 >
-
-## Results
-
-{nightly_results_benchmarking_table}
+This benchmark aims to:
+- Provide performance clarity: Provide clarity on which one (vllm, tensorrt-llm, lmdeploy and SGLang) leads in performance in what workload.
+- Be reproducible: one can run the exact same set of benchmarking commands inside the exact same docker by following reproducing instructions.
+
+Latest results: [results link](https://blog.vllm.ai/2024/09/05/perf-update.html), scroll to the end.
+
+Latest reproduction guilde: [github issue link](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/8176)
+
+
+## Setup
+
+- Docker images:
+  - vLLM: `vllm/vllm-openai:v0.6.2`
+  - SGLang: `lmsysorg/sglang:v0.3.2-cu121`
+  - LMDeploy: `openmmlab/lmdeploy:v0.6.1-cu12`
+  - TensorRT-LLM: `nvcr.io/nvidia/tritonserver:24.07-trtllm-python-py3`
+    - *NOTE: we uses r24.07 as the current implementation only works for this version. We are going to bump this up.*
+  - Check [nightly-pipeline.yaml](nightly-pipeline.yaml) for the concrete docker images, specs and commands we use for the benchmark.
+- Hardware
+  - 8x Nvidia A100 GPUs
+- Workload:
+  - Dataset
+    - ShareGPT dataset
+    - Prefill-heavy dataset (in average 462 input tokens, 16 tokens as output)
+    - Decode-heavy dataset (in average 462 input tokens, 256 output tokens)
+    - Check [nightly-tests.json](tests/nightly-tests.json) for the concrete configuration of datasets we use.
+  - Models: llama-3 8B, llama-3 70B.
+    - We do not use llama 3.1 as it is incompatible with trt-llm r24.07. ([issue](https://github.com/NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM/issues/2105)).
+  - Average QPS (query per second): 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and inf.
+    - Queries are randomly sampled, and arrival patterns are determined via Poisson process, but all with fixed random seed.
+  - Evaluation metrics: Throughput (higher the better), TTFT (time to the first token, lower the better), ITL (inter-token latency, lower the better).
+
+# Known issues
+
+- TRT-LLM crashes with Llama 3.1 8B [issue](https://github.com/NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM/issues/2105).
+- TGI does not support `ignore-eos` flag.

.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/nightly-pipeline.yaml

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ common_pod_spec: &common_pod_spec
 
 common_container_settings: &common_container_settings
   command:
-    - bash .buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/run-nightly-suite.sh
+    - bash .buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/scripts/run-nightly-benchmarks.sh
   resources:
     limits:
       nvidia.com/gpu: 8
@@ -37,7 +37,10 @@ common_container_settings: &common_container_settings
 
 steps:
   - block: ":rocket: Ready for comparing vllm against alternatives? This will take 4 hours."
-  - label: "A100 trt benchmark"
+
+
+
+  - label: "A100 vllm step 10"
     priority: 100
     agents:
       queue: A100
@@ -46,7 +49,21 @@ steps:
           podSpec:
             <<: *common_pod_spec
             containers:
-              - image: nvcr.io/nvidia/tritonserver:24.04-trtllm-python-py3
+              - image: vllm/vllm-openai:v0.6.2
+                <<: *common_container_settings
+
+
+
+  - label: "A100 sglang benchmark"
+    priority: 100
+    agents:
+      queue: A100
+    plugins:
+      - kubernetes:
+          podSpec:
+            <<: *common_pod_spec
+            containers:
+              - image: lmsysorg/sglang:v0.3.2-cu121
                 <<: *common_container_settings
 
   - label: "A100 lmdeploy benchmark"
@@ -58,11 +75,13 @@ steps:
           podSpec:
             <<: *common_pod_spec
             containers:
-              - image: openmmlab/lmdeploy:v0.5.0
+              - image: openmmlab/lmdeploy:v0.6.1-cu12
                 <<: *common_container_settings
-  
 
-  - label: "A100 vllm benchmark"
+
+
+
+  - label: "A100 trt llama-8B"
     priority: 100
     agents:
       queue: A100
@@ -71,10 +90,25 @@ steps:
           podSpec:
             <<: *common_pod_spec
             containers:
-              - image: vllm/vllm-openai:latest 
+              - image: nvcr.io/nvidia/tritonserver:24.07-trtllm-python-py3
                 <<: *common_container_settings
+                env:
+                  - name: VLLM_USAGE_SOURCE
+                    value: ci-test
+                  - name: HF_HOME
+                    value: /root/.cache/huggingface
+                  - name: VLLM_SOURCE_CODE_LOC
+                    value: /workspace/build/buildkite/vllm/performance-benchmark
+                  - name: HF_TOKEN
+                    valueFrom:
+                      secretKeyRef:
+                        name: hf-token-secret
+                        key: token
+                  - name: TEST_SELECTOR
+                    value: "llama8B"
 
-  - label: "A100 tgi benchmark"
+
+  - label: "A100 trt llama-70B"
     priority: 100
     agents:
       queue: A100
@@ -83,12 +117,54 @@ steps:
           podSpec:
             <<: *common_pod_spec
             containers:
-              - image: ghcr.io/huggingface/text-generation-inference:2.1 
+              - image: nvcr.io/nvidia/tritonserver:24.07-trtllm-python-py3
                 <<: *common_container_settings
+                env:
+                  - name: VLLM_USAGE_SOURCE
+                    value: ci-test
+                  - name: HF_HOME
+                    value: /root/.cache/huggingface
+                  - name: VLLM_SOURCE_CODE_LOC
+                    value: /workspace/build/buildkite/vllm/performance-benchmark
+                  - name: HF_TOKEN
+                    valueFrom:
+                      secretKeyRef:
+                        name: hf-token-secret
+                        key: token
+                  - name: TEST_SELECTOR
+                    value: "llama70B"
+
+
+  # FIXME(Kuntai): uncomment this after NVIDIA gives us their test docker image 
+  # - label: "A100 trt benchmark"
+  #   priority: 100
+  #   agents:
+  #     queue: A100
+  #   plugins:
+  #     - kubernetes:
+  #         podSpec:
+  #           <<: *common_pod_spec
+  #           containers:
+  #             - image: nvcr.io/nvidia/tritonserver:24.07-trtllm-python-py3
+  #               <<: *common_container_settings
+
+
+  # FIXME(Kuntai): uncomment this after TGI supports `--ignore-eos`.
+  # - label: "A100 tgi benchmark"
+  #   priority: 100
+  #   agents:
+  #     queue: A100
+  #   plugins:
+  #     - kubernetes:
+  #         podSpec:
+  #           <<: *common_pod_spec
+  #           containers:
+  #             - image: ghcr.io/huggingface/text-generation-inference:2.2.0
+  #               <<: *common_container_settings
 
   - wait
 
-  - label: "Plot"
+  - label: "Collect the results"
     priority: 100
     agents:
       queue: A100
@@ -117,4 +193,4 @@ steps:
                     name: hf-token-secret
                     key: token
 
-  - wait
+  - block: ":rocket: check the results!"