You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are a lot of O. S. designations of dates in these volumes. This is probably not at all clear to most modern readers. Perhaps in the modernized edition at least, we could expand this to (old-style) or something like that, or add a footnote, or both -- or maybe just convert the dates and remove the designation?
Whatever we decide, it might be good to apply this convention to the rest of our modernized books as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are a lot of
O. S.
designations of dates in these volumes. This is probably not at all clear to most modern readers. Perhaps in the modernized edition at least, we could expand this to (old-style) or something like that, or add a footnote, or both -- or maybe just convert the dates and remove the designation?Whatever we decide, it might be good to apply this convention to the rest of our modernized books as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: