We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#
In a multiline string a # shouldn't do anything. E.g. this errors:
""" A fn # Example An ex. """ f(x) = 1
with ERROR: LoadError: LoadError: syntax: incomplete: invalid string syntax in expression starting at string:1
ERROR: LoadError: LoadError: syntax: incomplete: invalid string syntax in expression starting at string:1
Work-around
""" A fn ## Example An ex. """ f(x) = 1
Note, this is not tied to doc-strings but in general multi-line strings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't think this can be easily fixed without a Julia parser...
Sorry, something went wrong.
I see, no worries.
I was considering asking this in a separate issue, but it kind of resonates with this one.
I'm curious why Literate chose to overload Julia comments for documentation text rather than using top level Markdown strings?
Might this be changed in a furure major relase, or maybe become controlable through a global flag?
No branches or pull requests
In a multiline string a
#
shouldn't do anything. E.g. this errors:with
ERROR: LoadError: LoadError: syntax: incomplete: invalid string syntax in expression starting at string:1
Work-around
Note, this is not tied to doc-strings but in general multi-line strings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: