Skip to content

Conversation

@sylr
Copy link
Contributor

@sylr sylr commented Nov 21, 2025

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Sylvain Rabot <sylvain@formance.com>
@sylr sylr requested a review from a team as a code owner November 21, 2025 15:35
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .github/actions/default/action.yml is excluded by !**/*.yml

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/tune-ci

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.13%. Comparing base (0870634) to head (90ac33a).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1152      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.06%   82.13%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         190      190              
  Lines        9319     9319              
==========================================
+ Hits         7648     7654       +6     
+ Misses       1219     1214       -5     
+ Partials      452      451       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@sylr sylr added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 24, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit e6b4d02 Nov 24, 2025
9 checks passed
@sylr sylr deleted the chore/tune-ci branch November 24, 2025 08:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants