-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
License details #4
Comments
hi @lrkrol
Summary: PS: MIT license is a joke🥴 |
Dear @zoghal, First of all, as you can see, no need to apologise to me for slow responses---but thank you very much for the response you did give. Secondly, indeed, what you say about licensing has been my problem as well. The original license permits at least personal use to whoever has obtained the font "directly from Hamoonsoft". Now, we can use the Internet archive to see that Hamoonsoft probably offered the font available online up until August 2011 through this page, but unfortunately the link to font downloads has not been archived, so we cannot be sure. If we could still download it from there, we could at least argue we got it "directly from Hamoonsoft" and would thus be allowed to use it. A few years later, at least up until November 2016, we can know for a fact that the font could be downloaded from scict.ir, as archived here. If SCICT was the rightful successor to Hamoonsoft, at least with respect to ownership of this font, we could argue that we can still obtain the font "directly from SCICT" through this archive link. That still wouldn't permit redistribution, technically, but at least we'd be allowed to use it for publications. This is version 1.001. however; I have not (yet) found 2.001 in the archives. Furthermore, in some jurisdictions, whenever a government body creates something, it is by definition in the public domain. If this reasoning applies to the SCICT, a government body of Iran, we could argue that in fact, the font has entered the public domain and thus we can do whatever we want with it. Of course, the original license does not appear to have been officially revoked, and anyway not SCICT, but Hamoonsoft is listed as the creator. You say that the council's executives said that the font was published with a free software license. Do you remember where you heard this? Is this a statement that you could find somewhere on the archived pages of the SCICT? If so, that might solve the problem: it could be taken as proof that the license has in fact been revoked. I'm just sharing thoughts here. As I said, unfortunately I have not been able to solve the problem, but now I'm hoping that with the use of the Internet archive, we may find a clarification that the font is public domain. |
dear @lrkrol
I translated the above text into English with the help of Google translator:
So we can conclude that the license of the first and second version of this font is public domain.✌️ |
Thanks @zoghal for this find! It is good news indeed. Although finding a statement from the Information Council itself somewhere in the archives would still be ideal, the statement from Mr. Zahedi is probably as clear as it's going to get. I am also happy to hear development has resumed with a clear, albeit non-public, license. Edit to add: |
Unfortunately, most of Iran's government websites are Iran Access and are not accessible from outside Iran. I checked this statement! Unfortunately, it is not true. It is not even clear what changes they made on the font that they published! If this statement were true! Why should the original designer release a commercial version?😉 |
This version based on the original IranNastaliq is published under the MIT license. The original IranNastaliq license, however, is still retained in the IranNastaliq-web.ttf file:
This original license does not permit redistribution:
I am thus unsure what the true license of this font is. Did you receive permission from hamoonsoft to redistribute this modified font under the MIT license? Or has the original IranNastaliq font been made freely available in some other way for your font to be allowed to carry the MIT license?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: