-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REQ] Is there a plan to support Alpine Linux in dockerfile-rails
instead of the Debian OS?
#69
Comments
A pull request that implemented alpine complete with tests would likely get merged. Technically, the changes are not difficult. But before those changes can be made, some research would need to be done. There are three places where packages are added:
Somebody would need to do the investigation to find out what the equivalent alpine package is for each of the packages listed there. As an example, the Alpine equivalent of build-essential appears to be build-base. |
Thank you very much for the information 🙏 |
Just to clarify, I personally don't have the experience needed to identify alpine equivalents of the packages I've identified. Somebody with that experience would be the one to create a pull request. I've just outlined the what questions they would need to be prepared to answer before proceeding. |
I spent a few minutes looking at alpine packages, and came up with a first pass: same: mappings: not found: Based on this, I'll take a look at adding an experimental flag for alpine in the next few days. |
Proof of concept:
Notes:
|
There apparently is a breaking change in alpine 3.19. sqlite3 works on 3.18:
|
Released: https://github.com/fly-apps/dockerfile-rails/releases/tag/v1.6.0 update to the latest version, then run:
|
Dear
dockerfile-rails
Team,Regarding the issue mentioned in the title, I am searching for a gem that supports
Alpine Linux
in the Dockerfile and Docker Compose for development purposes. Do you have any ideas? 😄Regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: