This crate contains executable, independently testable specifications
for the SIMD intrinsics provided by the core::arch library in Rust.
The structure of this crate is based on rust-lang/stdarch/crates/core_arch.
Within the core_arch folder in this crate, there is a different
folder for each architecture for which we have written models.
In particular, it contains folders for x86 and arm_shared.
Each such folder has 2 sub-folders: models and tests.
The models folder contains the models of the intrinsics, with
different files for different target features (e.g. sse2, avx2
etc.). The code in this folder is written using the various
abstractions implemented in abstractions, especially those in
abstractions::simd. These models are meant to closely
resemble their implementations within the Rust core itself.
The tests folder contains the tests of these models, and is
structured the same way as models. Each file additionally includes
the definition of a macro that makes writing these tests easier. The
tests work by testing the models against the intrinsics in the Rust
core, trying out random inputs (generally 1000), and comparing their
outputs.
All tests can be run by executing cargo test, and we expect this to be
run as part of CI.
There are three kinds of SIMD intrinsics in core::arch.
The first kind are builtin Rust compiler intrinsics, some of which are
in the intrinsics/simd.rs file
in the core crate, and others are in the simd.rs file of core_arch.
These builtin intrinsics define generic SIMD operations that the Rust compiler knows how to implement on each platform.
The second kind are extern intrinsics that are links to definitions in LLVM.
See, for example, this list
of extern intrinsics used in the Intel x86 AVX2 library.
These extern intrinsics are typically platform-specific functions that map to low-level instructions.
The third kind are defined intrinsics that are given proper definitions in Rust, and their code may
depend on the builtin intrinsics or the extern intrinsics. These defined intrinsics represent higher-level
operations that are wrappers around one or more assembly instructions.
We model all three kinds of intrinsics, but in slightly different
ways. For the builtin intrinsics, we can write implementations once
and for all, and to this end, we use a library within the
abstractions/simd.rs file, where we copy the signatures of the
intrinsics from Rust but give them our own implementation. In
particular, we model each SIMD vector as an array of scalars, and
define each generic operation as functions over such arrays. This can
be seen as a reference implementation of the builtin intrinsics.
Hence, for example, the SIMD add intrinsic simd_add is modeled as follows,
it takes two arrays of machine integers and adds them pointwise using a
wrapping_add operation:
pub fn simd_add<const N: u64, T: MachineInteger + Copy>(
x: FunArray<N, T>,
y: FunArray<N, T>,
) -> FunArray<N, T> {
FunArray::from_fn(|i| (x[i].wrapping_add(y[i])))
}Notably, we model a strongly typed version of simd_add, in contrast to the compiler
intrinsic, which is too generic and unimplementable in safe Rust:
/// Adds two simd vectors elementwise.
///
/// `T` must be a vector of integers or floats.
#[rustc_intrinsic]
#[rustc_nounwind]
pub unsafe fn simd_add<T>(x: T, y: T) -> T;The main rules for writing these models are that they should be simple and self-contained,
relying only on the libraries in abstractions, on builtin Rust language features, or
other testable models. In particular, they should not themselves directly call Rust libraries
or external crates, without going through the abstractions API.
For each file in core::arch, we split the code into extern
intrinsics that must be modeled by hand and defined intrinsics whose
models can be derived semi-automatically. The extern intrinsics are
placed in a module suffixed with _handwritten. Hence, for example,
the extern intrinsics used in avx2.rs can be found in avx2_handwritten.rs.
Modeling extern intrinsics is similar to modeling the builtin ones, in that the models are written by hand and treat the SIMD vectors as arrays of machine integers. The main difference is that these intrinsics are platform-specific and so their modeling requires looking at the Intel or ARM documentation for the underlying operation.
For example, the extern intrinsic phaddw used in avx2 corresponds to an
Intel instruction called "Packed Horizontal Add" and is used in AVX2 intrinsics
like _mm256_hadd_epi16 documented here
By inspecting the Intel documentation, we can write a Rust model for it
as follows
pub fn phaddw(a: i16x16, b: i16x16) -> i16x16 {
i16x16::from_fn(|i| {
if i < 4 {
a[2 * i].wrapping_add(a[2 * i + 1])
} else if i < 8 {
b[2 * (i - 4)].wrapping_add(b[2 * (i - 4) + 1])
} else if i < 12 {
a[2 * (i - 4)].wrapping_add(a[2 * (i - 4) + 1])
} else {
b[2 * (i - 8)].wrapping_add(b[2 * (i - 8) + 1])
}
})
}To model a defined intrinsic, we essentially copy the Rust code of the
intrinsic from core::arch and adapt it to use our underlying
abstractions. The changes needed to the code are sometimes
scriptable, and indeed most of our models were generated from a script
(see the ANNEX at the bottom of this file), but some changes are still
needed by hand.
For example, let us say the intrinsic we are modeling is
_mm256_bsrli_epi128 from the avx2 feature set.
-
We go to rust-lang/stdarch/crates/core_arch/src/x86/, and find the implementation of the intrinsic in
avx2.rs. -
We see that the implementation looks like this:
/// Shifts 128-bit lanes in `a` right by `imm8` bytes while shifting in zeros.
///
/// [Intel's documentation](https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/intrinsics-guide/index.html#text=_mm256_bsrli_epi128)
#[inline]
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
#[cfg_attr(test, assert_instr(vpsrldq, IMM8 = 1))]
#[rustc_legacy_const_generics(1)]
#[stable(feature = "simd_x86", since = "1.27.0")]
pub fn _mm256_bsrli_epi128<const IMM8: i32>(a: __m256i) -> __m256i {
static_assert_uimm_bits!(IMM8, 8);
const fn mask(shift: i32, i: u32) -> u32 {
let shift = shift as u32 & 0xff;
if shift > 15 || (15 - (i % 16)) < shift {
0
} else {
32 + (i + shift)
}
}
unsafe {
let a = a.as_i8x32();
let r: i8x32 = simd_shuffle!(
i8x32::ZERO,
a,
[
mask(IMM8, 0),
mask(IMM8, 1),
mask(IMM8, 2),
mask(IMM8, 3),
...
mask(IMM8, 31),
],
);
transmute(r)
}
}Thus, we then go to core_arch/x86/models/avx2.rs, and add this implementation.
The only changes it requires here are that the simd_shuffle macro is a function in our model,
the ZERO constant is now a function, and we discard all the function attributes.
The exact diff between the original and edited code for this function is:
13,14c13,14
< let r: i8x32 = simd_shuffle(
< i8x32::ZERO(),
---
> let r: i8x32 = simd_shuffle!(
> i8x32::ZERO,For other intrinsics, we sometimes need to make more changes. Since our model of the builtin intrinsics
is more precise concerning the type of their arguments compared to their Rust counterparts, we
sometimes need to add more type annotations in our defined models. We also remove all unsafe guards,
since our models are always in safe Rust. Otherwise, our code for the defined intrinsics looks very
similar to the upstream code in core::arch.
-
Next, we add a test for this intrinsic in
core_arch/avx2/tests/avx2.rs. For convenience purposes, we have defined amk!macro, which can be used to automatically generate tests. The test generated by the macro generates a number of random inputs (by default, 1000), and compares the output generated by the model and that generated by the intrinsic in upstreamcore::arch. A valid test of the intrinsic above looks like this.mk!([100]_mm256_bsrli_epi128{<0>,<1>,<2>,<3>,...,<255>}(a: BitVec));
The macro invocation has four parts.
mk!([100]...: By default, the macro tests for a thousand randomly generated inputs. If needed, this can be modified, such as here, where the[100]is used so that only 100 inputs are generated._mm256_bsrli_epi128: This is the name of the intrinsic being tested, and is necessary in all cases.{<0>,<1>,<2>,<3>,...,<255>}: This part only appears when the intrinsic has a const generic argument, like theIMM8in this intrinsic. As the name indicates, this constant argument is supposed to be at most 8 bits wide. We can confirm this by looking at the implementation and spotting thestatic_assert_uimm_bits!(IMM8, 8);line, which asserts that constant argument is positive and fits in 8 bits. Thus, we add{<0>,<1>,<2>,<3>,...,<255>}to test for each possible constant value of the constant argument.(a: BitVec): This part contains all the arguments of the intrinsic and their types.
This summarizes the steps needed to use the
mk!macro to generate a test. There is a caveat: in the case that the output of an intrinsic is not a bit-vector (and is instead, say, an integer likei32), then the macro will not work, and a manual test has to be written. You can see examples in the test files.
To contribute new models of intrinsics, we expect the author to follow
the above steps and provide comprehensive tests. It is important that
the model author looks carefully at both the Intel/ARM specifications
and the Rust stdarch implementation, because they may look quite different
from each other.
In some cases, the Rust implementation may not be correct.
Indeed, the previous implementation of _mm256_bsrli_epi128 (and a
similar intrinsic called _mm512_bsrli_epi128) in stdarch had a
bug, which we found during the process of modeling and testing this
intrinsic. This bug was reported by
us using a failing
test case generated from the testable model and then fixed by our
PR in the 2025-06-30
version of stdarch.
The following Rust program is a simple script that uses the syn crate to process an input Rust file
containing SIMD intrinsics into one suitable for the models described in this document. This code
is provided as illustration; for each set of core libraries we wish to model and test, there will
likely be need for a similar (or extended) script to automate the modeling process.
use syn::*;
use std::fs;
use std::env;
fn extract_model(input_file_path: &str, output_file_path: &str) -> Result<()> {
let source_code = fs::read_to_string(input_file_path).expect("unable to read file");
let mut syntax_tree: File = parse_file(&source_code)?;
syntax_tree.items.retain(|item|
match item {
Item::Use(_) => false,
_ => true
}
);
// Clear attributes from the file's top-level items
for item in &mut syntax_tree.items {
match item {
Item::Const(const_item) => {
const_item.attrs.retain(|attr| attr.path().is_ident("doc"));
},
Item::Fn(item_fn) => {
item_fn.attrs.retain(|attr| attr.path().is_ident("doc"));
item_fn.block.stmts.retain(|stmt|
match stmt {
Stmt::Item(Item::ForeignMod(_)) => false,
_ => true
}
);
for stmt in &mut item_fn.block.stmts {
match stmt {
Stmt::Expr(Expr::Unsafe(u), tok) => *stmt = Stmt::Expr(Expr::Block(
ExprBlock {attrs : Vec::new(), label : None, block : u.block.clone()}), *tok),
_ => ()
}
}
},
Item::Struct(item_struct) => {
item_struct.attrs.clear();
for field in &mut item_struct.fields {
field.attrs.retain(|attr| attr.path().is_ident("doc"));
}
},
Item::Enum(item_enum) => {
item_enum.attrs.clear();
for variant in &mut item_enum.variants {
variant.attrs.retain(|attr| attr.path().is_ident("doc"));
}
},
// Add more cases for other Item types (e.g., Item::Mod, Item::Impl, etc.)
_ => {
// For other item types, if they have an 'attrs' field, clear it.
// This requires more specific matching or a helper trait.
}
}
}
let formatted_string = prettyplease::unparse(&syntax_tree);
fs::write(output_file_path, formatted_string).expect("unable to write file");
Ok(())
}
fn main() -> Result<()> {
let args: Vec<String> = env::args().collect();
if args.len() < 3 {
println!("usage: modelize <path to input Rust file> <path to output Rust file>")
}
extract_model(&args[1], &args[2])
}