-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: add glossary, terms section #186
Comments
A few quick ideas flux instance: a group of
EDIT: If it's okay, I'm going to edit this comment with definitions I've found by looking through our docs site or throughout our repos. |
i'll just throw this out there, would a similar "acronyms" page be useful? or is a glossary enough. tbon ehhh the list is sorta short, perhaps longer out if we end up with enough of them |
I think that's a great idea. If we don't dedicate an entire page, we could at least spell out the acronym in parentheses the first time it is used in our docs. This is at least the format I follow when I write papers. For example, the Flux KVS section already does something like this:
Although the method I mentioned above reverses this: - The key-value store (kvs)
+ The KVS (key-value store) |
IMHO throw everything in the glossary, acronym or backronym or no. |
Mentioned in #185, it might be a good idea to add a Glossary page to our docs site to go into slightly more detail with some of the Flux-specific concepts we introduce in our guides. This could either be a separate page, hyperlinks to footnotes on the bottom of the page they are introduced in, or both.
Definitions of these terms should probably be kept brief; if they are complex terms or concepts, perhaps there should be consideration of making them their own page on the docs site.
I think it might be a good idea to collaborate some on coming up with these definitions (since I am not the one who came up with a number of these concepts and am probably bound to get them wrong 😆), so if others are okay with it, this could make for a good coffee hour exercise! I would be happy to work on adding these to the docs site, however.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: