Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New ANN libraries much faster than flann! #499

Open
fengweichangzi opened this issue Sep 29, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

New ANN libraries much faster than flann! #499

fengweichangzi opened this issue Sep 29, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@fengweichangzi
Copy link

I think this project does not update anymore.
I tried to find some other similar library and found one benchmark that can compare all ANN libraries.

Well, flann performs not so good.
https://erikbern.com/2018/02/15/new-benchmarks-for-approximate-nearest-neighbors.html

Maybe it is time for us to try some new ANN libraries.
E.g., HNSW, KGraph, SW-graph,FAISS-IVF Annoy and so on

@stephematician
Copy link

That's a great resource.

It's hard to say whether FLANN is slower or faster because it depends on the size of the index, the dimensions, the algorithm used, the number of queries, the precision required, and things like the entropy/mutual information of the data - there are many factors!

In problems where the number of queries >> size of the index, at higher dimensions, HNSW and others are probably faster than FLANN - but it can still vary depending on some of those factors listed.

To make it easier to find - more up-to-date comparisons of ANN can be found via https://github.com/erikbern/ann-benchmarks/.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants