adding new feature to retry on Aerospike runtime exceptions Issue#202

[patkivikram]

Note: Before submitting this pull request, please review our contributing
guidelines.

Description

Fixes #202

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #203 (60bea84) into master (808312b) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 54.28%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #203      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.51%   94.46%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         100      100              
  Lines       10631    10643      +12     
  Branches     1202     1199       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits        10048    10054       +6     
- Misses        514      524      +10     
+ Partials       69       65       -4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
faust/stores/aerospike.py	76.82% <54.28%> (-2.32%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 808312b...60bea84. Read the comment docs.

[taybin]

Did you consider using a library like tenacity? I've used that in my faust client and it works well. I know it expands the requirements, but if we want to start having retry code elsewhere, it might be better to use something like that than re-implementing it.

[patkivikram]

Did you consider using a library like tenacity? I've used that in my faust client and it works well. I know it expands the requirements, but if we want to start having retry code elsewhere, it might be better to use something like that than re-implementing it.

No I havent looked into it yet. Let me take a look and post a PR with an update