[compiler:codegen] Wrap non-ascii characters in JsxExpressionContainer #29997
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
poteto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
This PR extends the previous logic added in #29141 to also account for other kinds of non-ascii characters such as `\n`. Because these control characters are individual special characters (and not 2 characters `\` and `n`) we match based on unicode which was already being checked for non-Latin characters. This allows control characters to continue to be compiled equivalently to its original source if it was provided in a JsxExpressionContainer. However note that this PR does not convert JSX attributes that are StringLiterals to JsxExpressionContainer, to preserve the original source code as it was written. Alternatively we could always emit a JsxExpressionContainer if it was used in the source and not try to down level it to some other node kind. But since we already do this I opted to keep this behavior. ghstack-source-id: 42a80bb Pull Request resolved: #29997
facebook-github-bot
added
CLA Signed
React Core Team
poteto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
This PR extends the previous logic added in #29141 to also account for other kinds of non-ascii characters such as `\n`. Because these control characters are individual special characters (and not 2 characters `\` and `n`) we match based on unicode which was already being checked for non-Latin characters. This allows control characters to continue to be compiled equivalently to its original source if it was provided in a JsxExpressionContainer. However note that this PR does not convert JSX attributes that are StringLiterals to JsxExpressionContainer, to preserve the original source code as it was written. Alternatively we could always emit a JsxExpressionContainer if it was used in the source and not try to down level it to some other node kind. But since we already do this I opted to keep this behavior. Partially addresses #29648. ghstack-source-id: 42a80bb Pull Request resolved: #29997
poteto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
This PR extends the previous logic added in #29141 to also account for other kinds of non-ascii characters such as `\n`. Because these control characters are individual special characters (and not 2 characters `\` and `n`) we match based on unicode which was already being checked for non-Latin characters. This allows control characters to continue to be compiled equivalently to its original source if it was provided in a JsxExpressionContainer. However note that this PR does not convert JSX attributes that are StringLiterals to JsxExpressionContainer, to preserve the original source code as it was written. Alternatively we could always emit a JsxExpressionContainer if it was used in the source and not try to down level it to some other node kind. But since we already do this I opted to keep this behavior. Partially addresses #29648. ghstack-source-id: 965cf50 Pull Request resolved: #29997
poteto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
This PR extends the previous logic added in #29141 to also account for other kinds of non-ascii characters such as `\n`. Because these control characters are individual special characters (and not 2 characters `\` and `n`) we match based on unicode which was already being checked for non-Latin characters. This allows control characters to continue to be compiled equivalently to its original source if it was provided in a JsxExpressionContainer. However note that this PR does not convert JSX attributes that are StringLiterals to JsxExpressionContainer, to preserve the original source code as it was written. Alternatively we could always emit a JsxExpressionContainer if it was used in the source and not try to down level it to some other node kind. But since we already do this I opted to keep this behavior. Partially addresses #29648. ghstack-source-id: e5f3ca7 Pull Request resolved: #29997
poteto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
This PR extends the previous logic added in #29141 to also account for other kinds of non-ascii characters such as `\n`. Because these control characters are individual special characters (and not 2 characters `\` and `n`) we match based on unicode which was already being checked for non-Latin characters. This allows control characters to continue to be compiled equivalently to its original source if it was provided in a JsxExpressionContainer. However note that this PR does not convert JSX attributes that are StringLiterals to JsxExpressionContainer, to preserve the original source code as it was written. Alternatively we could always emit a JsxExpressionContainer if it was used in the source and not try to down level it to some other node kind. But since we already do this I opted to keep this behavior. Partially addresses #29648. ghstack-source-id: 552bd44 Pull Request resolved: #29997
poteto
commented
Jun 20, 2024
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Eval output | ||
| (kind: ok) <div><span>A E</span><span>나은</span><span>Sathya</span></div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
note that these still render correctly and no extra escaping was added
poteto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
This PR extends the previous logic added in #29141 to also account for other kinds of non-ascii characters such as `\n`. Because these control characters are individual special characters (and not 2 characters `\` and `n`) we match based on unicode which was already being checked for non-Latin characters. This allows control characters to continue to be compiled equivalently to its original source if it was provided in a JsxExpressionContainer. However note that this PR does not convert JSX attributes that are StringLiterals to JsxExpressionContainer, to preserve the original source code as it was written. Alternatively we could always emit a JsxExpressionContainer if it was used in the source and not try to down level it to some other node kind. But since we already do this I opted to keep this behavior. Partially addresses #29648. ghstack-source-id: 032700c Pull Request resolved: #29997
Closed
4 tasks
poteto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
This PR extends the previous logic added in #29141 to also account for other kinds of non-ascii characters such as `\n`. Because these control characters are individual special characters (and not 2 characters `\` and `n`) we match based on unicode which was already being checked for non-Latin characters. This allows control characters to continue to be compiled equivalently to its original source if it was provided in a JsxExpressionContainer. However note that this PR does not convert JSX attributes that are StringLiterals to JsxExpressionContainer, to preserve the original source code as it was written. Alternatively we could always emit a JsxExpressionContainer if it was used in the source and not try to down level it to some other node kind. But since we already do this I opted to keep this behavior. Partially addresses #29648. ghstack-source-id: ecc61c9 Pull Request resolved: #29997
|
Comparing: 0f56841...53436c3 Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: Expand to show
|
poteto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2024
This PR extends the previous logic added in #29141 to also account for other kinds of non-ascii characters such as `\n`. Because these control characters are individual special characters (and not 2 characters `\` and `n`) we match based on unicode which was already being checked for non-Latin characters. This allows control characters to continue to be compiled equivalently to its original source if it was provided in a JsxExpressionContainer. However note that this PR does not convert JSX attributes that are StringLiterals to JsxExpressionContainer, to preserve the original source code as it was written. Alternatively we could always emit a JsxExpressionContainer if it was used in the source and not try to down level it to some other node kind. But since we already do this I opted to keep this behavior. Partially addresses #29648. ghstack-source-id: ecc61c9 Pull Request resolved: #29997
This was referenced Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
This PR extends the previous logic added in #29141 to also account for
other kinds of non-ascii characters such as
\n. Because these controlcharacters are individual special characters (and not 2 characters
\and
n) we match based on unicode which was already being checked fornon-Latin characters.
This allows control characters to continue to be compiled equivalently
to its original source if it was provided in a JsxExpressionContainer.
However note that this PR does not convert JSX attributes that are
StringLiterals to JsxExpressionContainer, to preserve the original
source code as it was written.
Alternatively we could always emit a JsxExpressionContainer if it was
used in the source and not try to down level it to some other node
kind. But since we already do this I opted to keep this behavior.
Partially addresses #29648.