Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

eslint-plugin-react-hooks useEffect autofix of adding function names causes a lot of infinite loops #15084

Closed
joshunger opened this issue Mar 11, 2019 · 20 comments

Comments

@joshunger
Copy link

I've read "My function value is constant" from #14920 (comment).

There is a problem on the opposite spectrum of this, which is where you get infinite loops (a function value always changes). We catch that in the lint rule now when possible (in the same component) and suggest a fix. But it's tricky if you pass something several levels down.

If you autofix the useEffect, would it also be possible to autofix any functions added by wrapping them in a useCallback at the same time?

This would greatly improve the user experience.

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Mar 12, 2019

A much better fix is usually to either move a function either outside of the component (if it doesn't use props or state), or move it inside the effect (if it does). useCallback is the escape hatch for when you can't or don't want to do either. So I don't think we'd want to autofix it to useCallback every time.

We could offer an option that disables the autofix when we detect function deps.

@joshunger
Copy link
Author

That would be a better fix. I think a lot of people end up on your original code example #14326 (comment).

@joshunger
Copy link
Author

You could leave autofix if there was a better solution for detecting infinite async loops.

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Mar 12, 2019

Thanks, I updated that example.

@RIP21
Copy link

RIP21 commented Mar 15, 2019

@gaearon I'm sorry for the completely unrelated question in the topic (feel free to delete it)
But is the extraneous-deps rule is stable now to use, and all problems and false positives have been sorted?

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Mar 15, 2019

We've been using it at FB for a few weeks now and are pretty happy with it.

@dagda1
Copy link

dagda1 commented Apr 7, 2019

I have a problem when --fix is enabled on this line. It changes the deps to:

  const ref = useRef<HTMLElement>(null);
  const [shortcuts, setShortcuts] = useState<ShortcutAction[]>();

  useLayoutEffect(() => {
    const trapper = scoped && ref.current ? new mousetrap(ref.current) : mousetrap;

    const map = mapKey ? (shortcutMap[mapKey] as Shortcut) : (shortcutMap as Shortcut);

    const shortcutActions = buildShortcuts(map);

    shortcutActions.forEach((shortcut) => {
      trapper.bind(shortcut.keys, (e: ExtendedKeyboardEvent) => {
        e.preventDefault();
        e.stopPropagation();

        handler(shortcut.action, e);
      });

      shortcut.trapper = trapper;
    });

    setShortcuts(shortcutActions);

    return () => {
      if (!shortcuts) {
        return;
      }

      shortcuts.forEach((shortcut) => {
        if (shortcut.trapper) {
          shortcut.trapper.unbind(shortcut.keys);
        }
      });
    };
  }, [handler, mapKey, scoped, shortcutMap, shortcuts]);

Adding the shortcuts dep will cause an infinite loop as setShortcuts is called which will cause a rerender.

@dagda1
Copy link

dagda1 commented Apr 7, 2019

I have this shortterm fix:

const previousHandler = usePrevious(handler);

  useLayoutEffect(() => {
    if (shortcuts && handler === previousHandler) {
      return;
    }

I very well could be approaching this wrong :)

@amh4r
Copy link

amh4r commented May 2, 2019

Maybe I'm missing something, but how would I prevent infinite loops in this example?

CodePen example

By adding onChange() as a dep, changing the "Primary Input" goes into an infinite loop.

EDIT:

Solved it with useCallback(). Here's the CodePen.

@wcastand
Copy link

wcastand commented May 26, 2019

Hello, the eslint rule is creating an infinite loop in my case too:

gist

I'm guessing there is a better way to do what i do without the infinite loop and disabling eslint.

TLDR:
on my React app, i can receive the code for oauth2.
when i do, i make a fetch to my backend to get an access_token, then i register the token in localStorage.

If i have a token or the token change, i make a call to my backend to get a list of artists.

In both cases, i use in the useEffect: setArtists or setToken and the eslint rules add them to the array, which creates an infinite loop.

PS: the solution for @goodoldneon is not working in my case, when i copy his code into my editor, the autoformat is adding the setX into the array of useCallback and will create the same issue.

@amh4r
Copy link

amh4r commented May 28, 2019

@wcastand, is your editor saying you need the useState() set functions as deps in useCallback()?

@wcastand
Copy link

Yeah, i'm using vscode if that helps. The auto format/fixing is adding the setters and vars in the array and that creates an infinite loop.
I added //eslint-disable-next-line and now it works but that feels like a hack lol

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented May 28, 2019

@wcastand The correct fix in your case is to wrap customSetState that’s returned from your custom Hook into useCallback. Then it can safely be specified as a dependency (like it should be).

Please read the documentation which explains all of these cases one by one:

@wcastand
Copy link

wcastand commented Jun 5, 2019

Thanks for the help, sorry for the delayed answer, i'll try this out when i can but the project was based on spotify api and i am hitting limit rate for various reason and limitation of their API.

Anyway thanks for the example, this issues won't be issues anymore after Suspense and cache are introduced for React right?

@louisgv
Copy link

louisgv commented Jun 30, 2019

@gaearon I made a reproduction of a custom hook to work with array: https://codesandbox.io/s/hopeful-meadow-629zh

The set function is re-exported from the dipatcher of useState(), however eslint throw error as I'm calling it from the object. Wonder what is your thought as to whether this is a valid case?

My thinking is that I could eitehr useReducer, or export my hook as an array, or memo the object I'm exporting from my hook :-? ...

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Jun 30, 2019

Yeah you can memo that object.

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Jun 30, 2019

It would probably make sense to me if you didn’t keep using the object directly. But destructure individual functions from it instead. Then they can be more stable (for example a setter would never need to change). You could useCallback for those individual functions.

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Aug 2, 2019

Regarding the autofix, I hope eslint/rfcs#30 will let us solve the problem without compromising on IDE suggestions.

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Nov 15, 2019

Let's consolidate and track this in #16313 instead.

@gaearon gaearon closed this as completed Nov 15, 2019
@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Feb 17, 2020

This is resolved now.
#16313 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants