Codemod some expiration tests to waitForExpired (#26491)

Continuing my journey to migrate all the Scheduler flush* methods to
async versions of the same helpers.

`unstable_flushExpired` is a rarely used helper that is only meant to be
used to test a very particular implementation detail (update starvation
prevention, or what we sometimes refer to as "expiration").

I've prefixed the new helper with `unstable_`, too, to indicate that our
tests should almost always prefer one of the other patterns instead.

Author: acdlite

packages/internal-test-utils/ReactInternalTestUtils.js

@@ -29,24 +29,23 @@ async function waitForMicrotasks() {
   });
 }
 
-export async function waitFor(expectedLog) {
+export async function waitFor(expectedLog, options) {
   assertYieldsWereCleared(SchedulerMock);
 
   // Create the error object before doing any async work, to get a better
   // stack trace.
   const error = new Error();
   Error.captureStackTrace(error, waitFor);
 
+  const stopAfter = expectedLog.length;
   const actualLog = [];
   do {
     // Wait until end of current task/microtask.
     await waitForMicrotasks();
     if (SchedulerMock.unstable_hasPendingWork()) {
-      SchedulerMock.unstable_flushNumberOfYields(
-        expectedLog.length - actualLog.length,
-      );
+      SchedulerMock.unstable_flushNumberOfYields(stopAfter - actualLog.length);
       actualLog.push(...SchedulerMock.unstable_clearLog());
-      if (expectedLog.length > actualLog.length) {
+      if (stopAfter > actualLog.length) {
         // Continue flushing until we've logged the expected number of items.
       } else {
         // Once we've reached the expected sequence, wait one more microtask to
@@ -61,6 +60,12 @@ export async function waitFor(expectedLog) {
     }
   } while (true);
 
+  if (options && options.additionalLogsAfterAttemptingToYield) {
+    expectedLog = expectedLog.concat(
+      options.additionalLogsAfterAttemptingToYield,
+    );
+  }
+
   if (equals(actualLog, expectedLog)) {
     return;
   }
@@ -151,6 +156,34 @@ ${diff(expectedError, x)}
   } while (true);
 }
 
+// This is prefixed with `unstable_` because you should almost always try to
+// avoid using it in tests. It's really only for testing a particular
+// implementation detail (update starvation prevention).
+export async function unstable_waitForExpired(expectedLog): mixed {
+  assertYieldsWereCleared(SchedulerMock);
+
+  // Create the error object before doing any async work, to get a better
+  // stack trace.
+  const error = new Error();
+  Error.captureStackTrace(error, unstable_waitForExpired);
+
+  // Wait until end of current task/microtask.
+  await waitForMicrotasks();
+  SchedulerMock.unstable_flushExpired();
+
+  const actualLog = SchedulerMock.unstable_clearLog();
+  if (equals(actualLog, expectedLog)) {
+    return;
+  }
+
+  error.message = `
+Expected sequence of events did not occur.
+
+${diff(expectedLog, actualLog)}
+`;
+  throw error;
+}
+
 // TODO: This name is a bit misleading currently because it will stop as soon as
 // React yields for any reason, not just for a paint. I've left it this way for
 // now because that's how untable_flushUntilNextPaint already worked, but maybe

packages/react-reconciler/src/__tests__/ReactExpiration-test.js

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ let useEffect;
 let assertLog;
 let waitFor;
 let waitForAll;
+let unstable_waitForExpired;
 
 describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
   beforeEach(() => {
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
     assertLog = InternalTestUtils.assertLog;
     waitFor = InternalTestUtils.waitFor;
     waitForAll = InternalTestUtils.waitForAll;
+    unstable_waitForExpired = InternalTestUtils.unstable_waitForExpired;
 
     const textCache = new Map();
 
@@ -124,18 +126,17 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
     expect(ReactNoop).toMatchRenderedOutput('Step 1');
 
     // Nothing has expired yet because time hasn't advanced.
-    Scheduler.unstable_flushExpired();
+    await unstable_waitForExpired([]);
     expect(ReactNoop).toMatchRenderedOutput('Step 1');
 
     // Advance time a bit, but not enough to expire the low pri update.
     ReactNoop.expire(4500);
-    Scheduler.unstable_flushExpired();
+    await unstable_waitForExpired([]);
     expect(ReactNoop).toMatchRenderedOutput('Step 1');
 
     // Advance by a little bit more. Now the update should expire and flush.
     ReactNoop.expire(500);
-    Scheduler.unstable_flushExpired();
-    assertLog(['Step 2']);
+    await unstable_waitForExpired(['Step 2']);
     expect(ReactNoop).toMatchRenderedOutput('Step 2');
   });
 
@@ -339,8 +340,7 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
 
     Scheduler.unstable_advanceTime(10000);
 
-    Scheduler.unstable_flushExpired();
-    assertLog(['D', 'E']);
+    await unstable_waitForExpired(['D', 'E']);
     expect(root).toMatchRenderedOutput('ABCDE');
   });
 
@@ -369,8 +369,7 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
 
     Scheduler.unstable_advanceTime(10000);
 
-    Scheduler.unstable_flushExpired();
-    assertLog(['D', 'E']);
+    await unstable_waitForExpired(['D', 'E']);
     expect(root).toMatchRenderedOutput('ABCDE');
   });
 
@@ -383,6 +382,7 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
     const InternalTestUtils = require('internal-test-utils');
     waitFor = InternalTestUtils.waitFor;
     assertLog = InternalTestUtils.assertLog;
+    unstable_waitForExpired = InternalTestUtils.unstable_waitForExpired;
 
     // Before importing the renderer, advance the current time by a number
     // larger than the maximum allowed for bitwise operations.
@@ -401,19 +401,17 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
     await waitFor(['Step 1']);
 
     // The update should not have expired yet.
-    Scheduler.unstable_flushExpired();
-    assertLog([]);
+    await unstable_waitForExpired([]);
 
     expect(ReactNoop).toMatchRenderedOutput('Step 1');
 
     // Advance the time some more to expire the update.
     Scheduler.unstable_advanceTime(10000);
-    Scheduler.unstable_flushExpired();
-    assertLog(['Step 2']);
+    await unstable_waitForExpired(['Step 2']);
     expect(ReactNoop).toMatchRenderedOutput('Step 2');
   });
 
-  it('should measure callback timeout relative to current time, not start-up time', () => {
+  it('should measure callback timeout relative to current time, not start-up time', async () => {
     // Corresponds to a bugfix: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/15479
     // The bug wasn't caught by other tests because we use virtual times that
     // default to 0, and most tests don't advance time.
@@ -424,15 +422,13 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
     React.startTransition(() => {
       ReactNoop.render('Hi');
     });
-    Scheduler.unstable_flushExpired();
-    assertLog([]);
+    await unstable_waitForExpired([]);
     expect(ReactNoop).toMatchRenderedOutput(null);
 
     // Advancing by ~5 seconds should be sufficient to expire the update. (I
     // used a slightly larger number to allow for possible rounding.)
     Scheduler.unstable_advanceTime(6000);
-    Scheduler.unstable_flushExpired();
-    assertLog([]);
+    await unstable_waitForExpired([]);
     expect(ReactNoop).toMatchRenderedOutput('Hi');
   });
 
@@ -476,9 +472,9 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
       // The remaining work hasn't expired, so the render phase is time sliced.
       // In other words, we can flush just the first child without flushing
       // the rest.
-      Scheduler.unstable_flushNumberOfYields(1);
+      //
       // Yield right after first child.
-      assertLog(['Sync pri: 1']);
+      await waitFor(['Sync pri: 1']);
       // Now do the rest.
       await waitForAll(['Normal pri: 1']);
     });
@@ -502,8 +498,9 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
 
       // The remaining work _has_ expired, so the render phase is _not_ time
       // sliced. Attempting to flush just the first child also flushes the rest.
-      Scheduler.unstable_flushNumberOfYields(1);
-      assertLog(['Sync pri: 2', 'Normal pri: 2']);
+      await waitFor(['Sync pri: 2'], {
+        additionalLogsAfterAttemptingToYield: ['Normal pri: 2'],
+      });
     });
     expect(root).toMatchRenderedOutput('Sync pri: 2, Normal pri: 2');
   });
@@ -606,18 +603,22 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
       startTransition(() => {
         setB(1);
       });
+      await waitFor(['B0']);
+
       // Expire both the transitions
       Scheduler.unstable_advanceTime(10000);
       // Both transitions have expired, but since they aren't related
       // (entangled), we should be able to finish the in-progress transition
       // without also including the next one.
-      Scheduler.unstable_flushNumberOfYields(1);
-      assertLog(['B0', 'C']);
+      await waitFor([], {
+        additionalLogsAfterAttemptingToYield: ['C'],
+      });
       expect(root).toMatchRenderedOutput('A1B0C');
 
       // The next transition also finishes without yielding.
-      Scheduler.unstable_flushNumberOfYields(1);
-      assertLog(['A1', 'B1', 'C']);
+      await waitFor(['A1'], {
+        additionalLogsAfterAttemptingToYield: ['B1', 'C'],
+      });
       expect(root).toMatchRenderedOutput('A1B1C');
     });
   });
@@ -662,8 +663,9 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
       Scheduler.unstable_advanceTime(10000);
 
       // The rest of the update finishes without yielding.
-      Scheduler.unstable_flushNumberOfYields(1);
-      assertLog(['B', 'C']);
+      await waitFor([], {
+        additionalLogsAfterAttemptingToYield: ['B', 'C'],
+      });
     });
   });
 
@@ -705,8 +707,9 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
 
       // Now flush the original update. Because it expired, it should finish
       // without yielding.
-      Scheduler.unstable_flushNumberOfYields(1);
-      assertLog(['A1', 'B1']);
+      await waitFor(['A1'], {
+        additionalLogsAfterAttemptingToYield: ['B1'],
+      });
     });
   });
 
@@ -731,16 +734,19 @@ describe('ReactExpiration', () => {
     assertLog(['A0', 'B0', 'C0', 'Effect: 0']);
     expect(root).toMatchRenderedOutput('A0B0C0');
 
-    await act(() => {
+    await act(async () => {
       startTransition(() => {
         root.render(<App step={1} />);
       });
+      await waitFor(['A1']);
+
       // Expire the update
       Scheduler.unstable_advanceTime(10000);
 
       // The update finishes without yielding. But it does not flush the effect.
-      Scheduler.unstable_flushNumberOfYields(1);
-      assertLog(['A1', 'B1', 'C1']);
+      await waitFor(['B1'], {
+        additionalLogsAfterAttemptingToYield: ['C1'],
+      });
     });
     // The effect flushes after paint.
     assertLog(['Effect: 1']);