Mapillary image positions -> Corrected or original

[eneerhut]

Description

There is some user feedback here that we might want to use the original GPS positions rather than Mapillary's computed positions. It seems we are using the latter now. Just filing this for consideration. We need a better sense of which positions are more accurate on average and use that as the image location.

Original

Corrected

[tsmock]

What I do in the JOSM Mapillary plugin is look at the delta between the computed and reported location; if the delta is too big (>6m), I just use the reported location. This only happens after I download the sequence though -- AFAIK, the computed location vector tiles don't have the non-computed location.

This fixes issues like this: https://rapideditor.org/edit#map=19.04/39.10021/-108.34914&background=Bing&datasets=fbRoads,msBuildings&disable_features=boundaries , but only after the user clicks on the sequence.